Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.5x · EV/EBITDA 11.0x · ROE 6.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $204.2B | $217.3B | $133.8B | $100.6B | $88.8B | $123.8B | $129.4B | $181.0B | $129.9B | $200.8B | $171.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $570.4B | $583.6B | $447.9B | $441.9B | $268.0B | $335.4B | $320.5B | $447.2B | $383.9B | $457.7B | $389.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.51 | 16.69 | 11.83 | 12.73 | 6.46 | 5.96 | 13.04 | 9.94 | 7.79 | — | 12.54 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.20 | 2.55 | 1.65 | 1.31 | 1.19 | 1.72 | 1.71 | 2.41 | 1.78 | 2.77 | 2.42 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.04 | 1.02 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.93 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | 4.57 | 2.88 | — | — | 3.91 | — | 3.35 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 3.54 | 2.63 | — | — | 3.51 | — | 3.18 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.85 | 5.52 | 5.74 | 3.60 | 4.67 | 4.25 | 5.96 | 5.27 | 6.32 | 5.51 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.01 | 24.11 | 20.97 | 25.29 | 11.62 | 10.67 | 18.24 | 16.08 | 14.11 | 17.32 | 15.47 |
| EV / EBIT | 28.77 | 29.43 | 26.27 | 34.23 | 14.25 | 12.21 | 23.51 | 18.71 | 16.37 | 20.11 | 18.15 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | 13.79 | 7.80 | — | — | 11.57 | — | 7.62 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 88.1% | 88.1% | 87.7% | 88.2% | 93.1% | 105.4% | 77.0% | 88.9% | 89.8% | 89.9% | 90.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 23.3% | 21.0% | 16.8% | 25.3% | 38.2% | 18.1% | 31.8% | 32.2% | 31.4% | 30.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.8% | 16.8% | 15.6% | 12.0% | 19.9% | 30.5% | 14.6% | 25.8% | 24.8% | -9.4% | 21.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.1% | 4.5% | 7.3% | 10.9% | 5.6% | 9.9% | 9.1% | -3.2% | 6.6% |
| ROA | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 1.0% | 1.0% | -0.4% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.3% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 1.5% | 2.8% | 2.8% | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| ROCE | 2.3% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 2.3% | 3.4% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 4.6% | 4.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 3.35 | 3.35 | 2.82 | 2.92 | 2.58 | 2.34 | 2.50 | 2.37 | 2.24 | 2.17 | 1.67 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 29.58 | 29.58 | 27.65 | 34.47 | 22.59 | 15.07 | 28.50 | 16.55 | 16.25 | 16.56 | 15.03 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.71 | 1.50 | 1.65 | 0.89 | 1.04 | 0.95 | 1.37 | 1.29 | 1.27 | 0.96 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 15.13 | 15.13 | 14.70 | 19.53 | 7.76 | 6.73 | 10.88 | 9.57 | 9.34 | 9.72 | 8.66 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | 9.22 | 4.92 | — | — | 7.66 | — | 4.26 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.73 | 3.44 | 1.02 | 0.84 | 0.97 | 1.38 | 1.72 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.4% | 2.5% | 3.9% | 5.2% | 5.6% | 4.2% | 4.1% | 3.0% | 3.9% | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 37.6% | 37.6% | 41.0% | 56.5% | 33.7% | 23.7% | 48.4% | 28.1% | 27.8% | — | 15.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.5% | 6.0% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 15.5% | 16.8% | 7.7% | 10.1% | 12.8% | — | 8.0% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | 21.9% | 34.7% | — | — | 25.5% | — | 29.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.9% | 8.4% | 5.6% | 6.1% | 3.7% | 9.2% | 3.4% | 10.8% | 11.7% | 7.2% | 5.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.4% | 10.9% | 9.5% | 11.3% | 9.3% | 13.4% | 7.6% | 13.8% | 15.6% | 9.1% | 6.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.9B | $1.9B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $2.1B | $2.3B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $2.9B |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
Bull/bear thesis, analyst target revisions, and earnings execution.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying C stock.
Citigroup Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 10.5x. The historical average is 14.2x. This places it at the 30th percentile of its historical range.
Citigroup Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 21.4x.
Citigroup Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 6.8%. The historical average is 10.4%.
Based on historical data, Citigroup Inc. is trading at a P/E of 10.5x. This is at the 30th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Citigroup Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.42% with a payout ratio of 37.6%.
Citigroup Inc. has 88.1% gross margin and 23.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Citigroup Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 29.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Earnings volatility and thin capital
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Trading Near Tangible Book Value
Based on the reported P/B of 1.03 and a price of $118.48 against tangible book value of $109.97 per share in 2026Q3, Citigroup trades at roughly 1.08 times tangible book, a level that prices the franchise close to its net asset base rather than as a premium earner. Investors should monitor whether ROTCE recovers enough to justify that multiple. Forward P/E of 10.41 versus trailing 16.95 implies the market expects earnings to rebound from the depressed 2025Q4 base, though that expectation rests on volatile quarterly results. Comparing against peers, Citigroup's P/B of 1.03 sits below JPM at 2.60 and MS at 2.58 but in line with BAC at 1.24, suggesting the market still discounts its returns relative to the higher-quality franchises.
The gap between Citigroup's 1.03 P/B and the 2.60 to 2.58 multiples at JPM and MS suggests the market applies a meaningful return discount to its balance sheet. The stock's trailing ROE of 2.5% in 2026Q3 is far below the 16% to 17% achieved by JPM and MS, which helps explain why the multiple has not re-rated despite the tangible book value rising from $94.94 in 2024Q1 to $109.97. Investors should monitor whether sustained ROTCE improvement can close this gap, since the current price offers limited margin of safety if returns stay near 2% to 3%.
ROE Recovery Driven by Fee Volatility
According to the reported ratios, ROE moved from 1.6% in 2024Q1 to 2.5% in 2026Q3, but the path was uneven, dipping to 1.1% in 2025Q4 and recovering to 2.7% in 2026Q1, with fee share swinging between 21.2% and 35.4%. The ROE remains well below the 10% to 17% range of peers. Decomposing through the DuPont framework, the net interest margin has been steady near 0.5% to 0.6%, so the improvement appears tied to non-interest income and efficiency gains rather than balance sheet leverage. Leverage is actually compressed, with equity to total assets near 0.07 to 0.09, which limits ROE upside from gearing.
Because the equity-to-assets ratio has fallen from about 0.09 to 0.07 while total assets expanded, leverage is not the source of recent ROE gains and may be working against them. The ROA of roughly 0.1% to 0.2% is very thin, meaning ROE is highly sensitive to any change in fee income or provisions. The volatility in fee share suggests earnings quality depends heavily on transactional activity, which warrants further investigation before treating the recent recovery as durable.
Efficiency Gains Offset Flat Margin
Based on reported figures, the efficiency ratio improved from 67.3% in 2024Q1 to 58.5% in 2026Q3, indicating expense discipline has outpaced revenue growth, while NIM held in a narrow 0.5% to 0.6% band across the ten quarters. The efficiency gain is the main driver of profitability improvement rather than margin expansion. Reported figures suggest operating leverage is working in management's favor, though the 58.5% level still trails the stronger franchises and leaves less room for error if revenues soften. The stable NIM suggests funding costs and asset yields have roughly offset each other during the period.
A roughly nine-point efficiency improvement is substantial, yet the reported figures do not show whether it came from genuine cost restructuring or from revenue timing, and that distinction matters for sustainability. With NIM flat, the bank does not appear to be benefiting from a widening spread, which may limit future net interest income growth. Investors should monitor whether efficiency can keep improving or whether it is approaching a floor that would leave earnings exposed to provision swings.
Thin Equity Base Constrains Capital Return
Based on Citigroup's reported equity-to-assets ratio of roughly 0.07 in 2026Q3, down from about 0.09 in 2024Q1, the capital cushion has narrowed as total assets expanded roughly 21% while equity grew only modestly. Capital adequacy ratios such as CET1 are not included in the supplied data, so regulatory headroom cannot be assessed directly. The thinning equity base suggests limited capacity for large capital returns without first rebuilding retained earnings, and the dividend yield of 2.4% carries a relatively heavy claim on earnings given the 2.5% ROE.
The equity-to-assets trend is the most direct proxy available, and it points to a balance sheet that has grown faster than its capital base, which could tighten regulatory flexibility if losses recur. Because the reported ROE of 2.5% is only modestly above the dividend yield, the current payout appears to rely on retained earnings from a narrow profit base. Investors should obtain CET1 and Tier 1 ratios before drawing firm conclusions about buyback capacity.
Provisions Absorb Pre-Provision Earnings
As reported in the financial statements, quarterly provisions held between $2.2B and $2.9B across the period, including $2.6B in both 2026Q3 and 2026Q1, a level that absorbs a meaningful share of quarterly net interest income of $15.7B to $17.0B. Non-performing loan and charge-off ratios are not included in the supplied data, so reserve adequacy cannot be directly tested. The persistence of elevated provisions suggests credit costs remain a structural drag on earnings rather than a one-time item.
Provisions near $2.6B per quarter against net income of only $2.4B to $5.8B mean credit costs consume a large portion of pre-provision profit, which may explain the compressed ROA. Without NPL coverage or charge-off data, it is not possible to determine whether reserves are conservative or merely keeping pace with losses. Investors should monitor provision trends alongside reserve coverage before concluding that credit risk is fully priced.
Price-to-Book Misreads Return Profile
The ratio most commonly misapplied to Citigroup is P/B, since a sub-1.1 multiple can appear cheap while masking that ROTCE is only in the low single digits. Based on reported figures, the 1.03 P/B looks like a discount to peers, yet the 2.5% ROE implies the market is not overpaying for a weak return stream. Price-to-tangible-book adjusted for ROTCE, or a justified P/B model, is a more appropriate tool than headline P/B alone.
Using P/B in isolation overstates value when the denominator reflects a large equity base earning very little, which is the case here with equity to assets near 0.07. The bank's efficiency and fee-driven recovery may not be sufficient to lift ROTCE toward the 12% to 17% range that would justify a higher multiple. Investors should monitor whether the return gap narrows before treating the apparent valuation discount as an opportunity.