Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.5x · EV/EBITDA 28.9x · ROE 16.9%. (2014–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.3B | $3.6B | $4.9B | $6.9B | $4.2B | $7.2B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.8B | $3.1B | $4.3B | $6.4B | $3.9B | $6.5B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.50 | 19.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.58 | 4.29 | 6.75 | 11.54 | 8.41 | 19.50 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.45 | 3.48 | 4.28 | 6.42 | 3.98 | 5.84 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 12.62 | 14.68 | 33.32 | 88.45 | — | 3087.40 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 13.34 | 14.34 | 30.28 | 79.89 | — | 631.22 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.66 | 5.94 | 10.77 | 7.87 | 17.48 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.89 | 77.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 207.23 | 57.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.53 | 29.34 | 82.56 | — | 2768.21 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 85.0% | 85.0% | 84.3% | 82.7% | 80.8% | 79.0% | 79.0% | 78.8% | 83.9% | 78.1% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | -19.2% | -28.5% | -46.9% | -55.2% | -22.5% | -17.2% | 8.9% | -12.0% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 21.9% | 21.9% | -13.2% | -23.0% | -46.6% | -51.7% | -22.9% | -18.1% | 3.4% | -0.0% | 2.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.9% | 16.9% | -8.6% | -12.9% | -20.3% | -15.5% | — | — | 4.3% | -0.0% | 2.7% |
| ROA | 11.4% | 11.4% | -6.2% | -9.7% | -16.2% | -20.8% | -16.6% | -10.9% | 1.8% | -0.0% | 1.0% |
| ROIC | 1.9% | 1.9% | -17.8% | -18.3% | -27.5% | -31.3% | — | — | 4.6% | -5.3% | 3.5% |
| ROCE | 1.2% | 1.2% | -11.9% | -15.2% | -19.7% | -27.8% | -25.6% | -13.6% | 5.2% | -6.1% | 3.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | — | — | — | 0.83 | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.08 | 1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.43 | — | 4.97 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.51 | -0.51 | -0.43 | -0.26 | -0.60 | — | — | 0.77 | 0.91 | 1.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -13.36 | -13.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4.12 | — | 4.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.15 | -3.99 | -5.89 | — | -319.19 | -4.06 | — | 7.89 | 8.07 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.11 | -2.85 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($570M) exceeds total debt ($43M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.20 | 2.20 | 3.10 | 4.14 | 4.63 | 6.36 | 2.05 | 2.81 | 0.37 | 0.34 | 0.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.20 | 2.20 | 3.10 | 4.14 | 4.63 | 6.36 | 2.05 | 2.81 | 0.35 | 0.31 | 0.53 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.57 | 1.57 | 2.62 | 3.63 | 4.22 | 5.93 | 1.56 | 2.27 | 0.18 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37.19 | 36.10 | 30.91 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 65.63 | 62.27 | 59.47 | 53.70 | 50.92 | 50.10 | 51.44 | 10.29 | 11.65 | 15.33 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.5% | 5.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 7.9% | 6.8% | 3.0% | 1.1% | — | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 11.5% | 10.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.5% | 10.7% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $294M | $301M | $293M | $285M | $275M | $253M | $47M | $17M | $17M | $17M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 12 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FRSH stock.
Freshworks Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 15.5x. The historical average is 19.4x.
Freshworks Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 28.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 77.8x.
Freshworks Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 16.9%. The historical average is -2.7%.
Based on historical data, Freshworks Inc. is trading at a P/E of 15.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Freshworks Inc. has 85.0% gross margin and 1.6% operating margin.
Freshworks Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Interest-income-dependent net profitability
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Multiples Reflect Cash Generation Over Earnings
Based on reported figures, FRSH trades at 19.2x trailing P/E and 13.7x P/FCF against a 39.6x trailing EV/EBITDA, a spread that suggests the market is anchoring on free cash flow rather than the thin operating earnings base.
The gap between the 19.2x trailing P/E and the 39.6x EV/EBITDA reflects how little operating profit sits beneath reported results, while the 13.7x P/FCF implies the market is crediting cash generation instead. Compared with the peer set, FRSH screens far below HubSpot at 233x earnings and Datadog at 597x, which may indicate investors are pricing it as a mature software name rather than a growth story. Forward EV/EBITDA of 10.9x versus trailing 39.6x suggests expected margin expansion is already embedded in consensus, so investors should monitor whether operating margins sustain their recent improvement.
Operating Margin Recovery Trails Headline Net Income
According to reported quarterly figures, operating margin improved from a loss of 25.1% in 2024Q2 to 11.5% in 2026Q3, yet the 21.9% net margin in 2025Q4 far exceeds the 17.8% operating margin, indicating non-operating support.
The steady gross margin band of roughly 84% to 86% indicates pricing and delivery efficiency are stable, but operating profitability has only recently turned positive and remains uneven, with losses reappearing in 2026Q1 and 2025Q3. The 2025Q4 net margin of 86.0% in the ratio table, versus a 17.8% operating margin, suggests substantial non-operating income that may not recur, so operating margin is the more reliable gauge of earning power. Investors should focus on whether operating margin sustains above 10% through the coming quarters rather than on headline net results.
Returns Recovering From Sustained Negative Territory
Based on reported figures, ROIC moved from -4.5% in 2024Q2 to 4.7% in 2026Q3, while ROE reached 2.0% in the latest quarter after several quarters of negative readings, indicating an early and still fragile return recovery.
The shift from negative to positive ROIC suggests the business is beginning to earn above its invested capital, but a 4.7% ROIC remains modest relative to the 10.1% ROIC posted by Salesforce and well below what a durable software franchise typically generates. The large cash balance inflates the capital base, which may depress ROIC and ROE mechanically even as operations improve. Investors should watch whether ROIC continues rising as the cash pile is deployed or returned, since capital efficiency rather than cash accumulation drives long-term compounding.
Liquidity Buffer Narrowing From Peak Levels
As reported in financial statements, the current ratio fell from 3.26 in 2024Q2 to 1.77 in 2026Q3, while cash of $466.6M against current liabilities of $583.3M still provides a meaningful buffer.
The decline in the current ratio from its peak suggests current liabilities have grown faster than liquid assets, likely reflecting deferred revenue build tied to subscription billing rather than deterioration in cash position. Even under severe stress, the $466.6M cash balance covers current liabilities on its own only partially, so the buffer depends on continued collection of receivables. Investors should monitor whether the current ratio stabilizes above roughly 1.5, as further compression would warrant closer scrutiny of working capital dynamics.
Price-to-Earnings Misleads on Interest-Driven Profits
The 19.2x trailing P/E is most commonly read as a cheap multiple, but based on reported figures it may overstate earnings quality because net income is supported by interest on cash rather than core software operations.
Applying P/E to FRSH rewards reported net income that the data suggests is substantially non-operating, so the apparent discount to peers may be an artifact of earnings composition rather than undervaluation. A more informative approach is to use EV/FCF or P/FCF, where the 13.7x multiple reflects cash generated by operations and is less distorted by interest income and stock-based compensation. Investors should adjust for stock-based compensation of $38.8M to $58.7M per quarter before drawing conclusions about the valuation discount.