Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 10.8x · EV/EBITDA 1.0x · ROE 33.1%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.4B | $23.2B | $11.2B | $7.6B | $5.8B | $6.6B | $6.0B | $1.2B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.8B | $-82964358766 | $8.1B | $8.6B | $3.5B | $24.0B | $21.6B | $2.5B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 10.77 | 2.05 | 2.06 | 1.79 | 2.00 | 2.35 | 4.54 | 8.06 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.28 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.98 | 1.92 | 1.22 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.02 | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.72 | 0.46 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 2.96 | 0.57 | 0.36 | — | 1.73 | 1.11 | 0.29 | 0.64 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.95 | 0.57 | 0.36 | — | 1.68 | 1.10 | 0.29 | 0.60 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | -3.64 | 0.59 | 0.86 | 0.48 | 3.56 | 6.90 | 2.53 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 1.00 | -5.81 | 1.19 | 1.66 | 0.94 | 7.25 | 13.95 | 9.70 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 1.01 | -6.08 | 1.22 | 1.72 | 0.98 | 7.53 | 14.70 | 13.11 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | -2.04 | 0.26 | — | 1.04 | 4.03 | 1.06 | 1.33 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 87.1% | 82.0% | 84.7% | 90.4% | 87.7% | 83.7% | 80.2% | 78.5% | 69.4% | 50.2% |
| Operating Margin | 61.6% | 61.6% | 48.7% | 50.0% | 48.7% | 47.2% | 47.0% | 19.3% | 29.2% | 2.8% | -132.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 49.6% | 49.6% | 40.1% | 42.8% | 40.0% | 41.7% | 42.4% | 17.0% | 19.4% | -2.8% | -117.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 33.1% | 33.1% | 20.7% | 18.8% | 14.0% | 19.2% | 24.4% | 9.1% | 31.9% | — | — |
| ROA | 5.8% | 5.8% | 4.3% | 4.5% | 3.0% | 3.3% | 2.9% | 0.9% | 1.0% | -0.1% | -2.2% |
| ROIC | 22.3% | 22.3% | 14.8% | 13.9% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 7.6% | 4.1% | 7.1% | 0.7% | -2775.8% |
| ROCE | 11.7% | 11.7% | 25.1% | 21.6% | 17.9% | 23.8% | 26.2% | 8.9% | 17.0% | 1.5% | -64.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 1.04 | 2.00 | 0.64 | 1.43 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.26 | 1.14 | 0.72 | 6.63 | 10.73 | 6.46 | 7.26 | 154.21 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -2.63 | -0.11 | 0.04 | -0.11 | 0.83 | 1.87 | 0.50 | 1.24 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -7.44 | -7.44 | -0.46 | 0.18 | -0.63 | 5.25 | 10.06 | 5.03 | 6.27 | 124.42 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.61 | -0.10 | — | -0.69 | 2.92 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.31 | 0.85 | 0.01 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | 12.20 | 8.44 | 7.93 | 2.11 | 2.18 | 0.42 | -31.99 |
Net cash position: cash ($123.9B) exceeds total debt ($17.7B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.15 | 9.15 | 1.19 | 1.32 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 1.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.15 | 9.15 | 1.19 | 1.32 | 0.58 | 0.55 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 1.03 |
| Cash Ratio | 7.17 | 7.17 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.8% | 9.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 19.0% | 19.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 9.3% | 48.8% | 48.6% | 55.9% | 50.0% | 42.5% | 22.0% | 12.4% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 33.8% | 175.5% | 275.2% | — | 57.9% | 90.0% | 339.9% | 156.3% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.4% | 53.8% | 17.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 9.3% | 0.0% | 11.4% | 53.8% | 17.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $141M | $140M | $140M | $144M | $152M | $131M | $115M | $64M | $111M | $111M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FUTU stock.
Futu Holdings Limited's current P/E ratio is 10.8x. The historical average is 3.3x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Futu Holdings Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 1.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.8x.
Futu Holdings Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 33.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 21.4%.
Based on historical data, Futu Holdings Limited is trading at a P/E of 10.8x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Futu Holdings Limited's current dividend yield is 1.76% with a payout ratio of 19.0%.
Futu Holdings Limited has 87.1% gross margin and 61.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Futu Holdings Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.2x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory overhang on mainland China client base
Premium Valuation Reflects Growth, Not Commodity Brokerage
FUTU's P/B of 3.35x trades at a significant premium to peers like UP Fintech (1.09x) and Interactive Brokers (2.03x), suggesting the market prices it as a high-growth fintech platform rather than a traditional brokerage, as reported in current market data.
The valuation premium appears justified by the company's superior ROE trajectory, which has expanded from 5.0% in Q2 2023 to 10.1% in Q2 2026, indicating improving capital efficiency. However, the P/E of 11.95x, when compared to the forward P/E of 1.60x, implies an expectation of explosive earnings growth that may be difficult to sustain, warranting close monitoring of client asset and paying client growth rates.
ROE Expansion Driven by Leverage and Efficiency
FUTU's ROE has doubled from 5.0% to 10.1% over three years, driven by a significant improvement in the efficiency ratio from 37.6% to 26.2%, indicating strong operating leverage as revenue scales faster than costs, based on the provided ratio data.
The DuPont decomposition suggests profitability is being enhanced by both asset utilization (implied by rising ROA from 1.1% to 1.5%) and increased financial leverage, as the equity-to-assets ratio has compressed from 21% to 13%. This leverage amplifies returns but also increases risk, particularly if the newly dominant interest income stream faces credit quality deterioration.
Efficiency Ratio Signals Scalable Platform Economics
The efficiency ratio has improved dramatically to 26.2% in Q2 2026 from 37.6% in Q2 2023, demonstrating that Futu's high-fixed-cost technology platform is generating substantial operating leverage as its user base and revenue scale, according to the company's reported figures.
This trend is a hallmark of a scalable digital platform, where incremental revenue carries minimal marginal cost. The improvement suggests management is successfully controlling operating expenses while growing the top line, a critical factor for sustaining profitability as the company expands into new, initially unprofitable markets like Japan and Malaysia.
Equity Buffer Diluted by Rapid Liability Growth
The equity-to-assets ratio has declined to 13% in Q2 2026 from 21% in Q2 2023, indicating that while absolute equity has grown, the balance sheet is becoming more leveraged as client liabilities grow faster than retained earnings, as reported in recent financial statements.
This compression in the equity ratio is a natural consequence of the brokerage model scaling with client deposits, but it reduces the capital buffer available to absorb potential losses on margin loans or market downturns. Investors should monitor whether this leverage is used to fund higher-yielding assets or simply reflects the growing pool of client cash held for trading.
P/E Multiple Obscures Earnings Quality Shift
The P/E ratio of 11.95x is likely the most misapplied metric for FUTU, as it fails to account for the sudden, material shift in revenue composition toward interest income, which may have different risk and sustainability characteristics than historical fee-based revenue.
The market may be applying a traditional earnings multiple to a business model undergoing structural change. The emergence of $2.6 billion in net interest income in Q2 2026, after eight quarters of zero, alongside a sharp decline in loan loss provisions, suggests the earnings base is now more sensitive to credit risk and interest rate movements. Analysts should instead focus on metrics like P/TBV and the sustainability of the new NIM, as the P/E can be volatile and misleading during such transitions.