Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -18.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -249.3%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.7B | $37.2B | $11.3B | $4.4B | $2.5B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $2.0B | $1.0B | $2.1B | $819M |
| Enterprise Value | $25.9B | $37.4B | $12.1B | $5.1B | $2.6B | $2.9B | $3.1B | $1.9B | $830M | $1.8B | $711M |
| P/E Ratio → | -18.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 42.30 | 61.31 | 31.14 | 14.26 | 10.02 | 16.20 | 19.76 | 14.80 | 102.57 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 34.21 | 50.31 | 39.69 | — | 27.95 | 7.44 | 11.78 | 7.72 | 4.84 | 5.75 | 5.30 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 61.74 | 33.23 | 16.62 | 10.44 | 15.65 | 18.98 | 14.13 | 84.42 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 79.4% | 76.4% | 78.5% | 77.5% | 76.6% | 75.7% | 82.3% | 75.4% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -194.0% | -194.0% | -241.5% | -232.5% | -186.4% | -199.0% | -161.3% | -172.4% | -3124.9% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -210.5% | -210.5% | -251.2% | -245.6% | -196.3% | -230.6% | -178.9% | -186.4% | -3297.2% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -249.3% | -249.3% | -320.2% | — | -193.2% | -126.7% | -109.4% | -108.2% | -113.9% | -74.7% | -75.6% |
| ROA | -59.5% | -59.5% | -54.5% | -50.2% | -33.2% | -42.6% | -38.2% | -37.8% | -60.8% | -55.0% | -59.3% |
| ROIC | -86.5% | -86.5% | -91.9% | -183.1% | -137.8% | -124.0% | -124.6% | -175.5% | -706.9% | -345.0% | -258.4% |
| ROCE | -66.8% | -66.8% | -62.0% | -55.2% | -35.5% | -42.0% | -39.8% | -39.8% | -65.2% | -60.2% | -63.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.04 | 1.04 | 4.60 | — | 13.39 | 1.49 | 1.47 | 1.52 | 1.52 | 0.15 | 0.35 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.35 | 2.66 | — | 1.18 | -0.25 | -0.46 | -0.35 | -0.86 | -0.90 | -0.70 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -14.18 | -14.18 | -9.77 | -8.21 | -17.31 | -9.83 | -8.95 | -8.20 | -11.78 | -31.56 | -49.36 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.83 | 3.83 | 5.45 | 4.12 | 6.69 | 6.19 | 5.24 | 6.51 | 6.51 | 8.72 | 6.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.54 | 3.54 | 5.12 | 3.75 | 6.33 | 5.70 | 4.83 | 6.18 | 6.42 | 8.72 | 6.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.05 | 3.05 | 4.82 | 3.46 | 6.04 | 5.30 | 4.48 | 5.72 | 6.21 | 8.54 | 5.81 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.02 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.86 | 0.34 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 84.78 | 52.20 | 49.26 | 44.20 | 47.16 | 36.77 | 51.44 | 204.67 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $214M | $164M | $140M | $123M | $112M | $98M | $85M | $77M | $67M | $62M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying INSM stock.
Insmed Incorporated's current P/E ratio is -18.5x. The historical average is 0.8x.
Insmed Incorporated's return on equity (ROE) is -249.3%. The historical average is -134.5%.
Based on historical data, Insmed Incorporated is trading at a P/E of -18.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Insmed Incorporated has 79.4% gross margin and -194.0% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Dilution and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Inflection Masks Structural Losses
Gross margin expanded to 84.2% in Q2 2026 from 73.9% a year earlier, per reported financials, yet operating margin remains deeply negative at -0.4%, indicating the commercial engine is still far from self-sustaining.
The dramatic narrowing of operating losses to near breakeven in Q2 2026, from -94.6% in Q4 2025, suggests early operating leverage as revenue growth outpaces expense growth. However, the net margin of -3.1% in Q2 2026, while improved, still reflects a loss-making enterprise, and the prior quarters' net margins of -124.5% and -53.5% highlight the volatility and dependence on one product. The gross margin expansion to 84.2% indicates strong pricing power for ARIKAYCE, but the heavy R&D and SG&A investment for pipeline assets like Brensocatib continues to suppress bottom-line profitability, implying that true earning power will only emerge with successful pipeline commercialization.
Return on Capital Still Deeply Negative
ROIC improved to -0.1% in Q2 2026 from -27.4% a year earlier, per the ratio data, but remains negative, indicating the company is not yet generating returns on its invested capital.
The improvement in ROIC from -90.0% in Q2 2024 to -0.1% in Q2 2026 is notable, driven by a combination of higher revenue and a reduced capital base after debt repayment. However, the negative ROIC across all ten quarters indicates that the company has not yet reached a point of value creation, and the recent near-zero reading is fragile, as it depends on sustaining the Q2 2026 revenue surge. The ROE of -1.8% in Q2 2026, while improved from -133.4% in Q1 2025, still reflects shareholder dilution and accumulated losses, suggesting that the company is in a transition phase where returns on capital are only beginning to inflect positively.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Mixed Signals
Cash conversion cycle turned negative to -112 days in Q2 2026, per the ratio data, driven by a DPO of 340 days, indicating the company is using supplier financing to offset inventory build.
The negative CCC in Q2 2026 is a sharp reversal from the positive 149 days in Q1 2026, primarily due to a spike in days payable outstanding to 340 days from 139 days, which may indicate extended payment terms with suppliers or timing of payments. Meanwhile, DSO improved to 42 days from 47 days, suggesting better receivables collection, but DIO remains elevated at 186 days, reflecting the complex manufacturing process for liposomal drugs. The volatility in CCC across quarters, swinging from 208 days in Q2 2024 to -112 days in Q2 2026, suggests that working capital management is not yet stable, and investors should monitor whether the negative CCC is sustainable or a one-off timing effect.
Leverage Eases but Debt Service Remains Thin
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.77 in Q2 2026 from 35.53 in Q2 2024, per the ratio data, yet interest coverage of 0.44 indicates earnings barely cover interest expense.
The dramatic deleveraging, with total debt reduced to $579.9M from $1.4B, has improved the balance sheet, but the interest coverage ratio of 0.44 in Q2 2026, while positive for the first time in the series, is still below 1.0, meaning operating income is insufficient to cover interest obligations. The prior quarters' negative interest coverage, such as -14.94 in Q4 2025, underscores the historical strain, and the improvement is largely due to the near-breakeven operating income in Q2 2026. However, the absolute debt level remains significant relative to equity, and the company's cash burn suggests that refinancing or additional equity raises may be necessary, implying ongoing leverage risk.
Liquidity Buffer Adequate but Shrinking
Current ratio improved to 3.72 in Q2 2026 from 1.80 in Q2 2024, per the ratio data, but cash dropped to $544.8M from $1.3B a year earlier, indicating a narrowing runway.
The current ratio of 3.72 and quick ratio of 3.40 in Q2 2026 suggest ample short-term liquidity to cover near-term obligations, but the rapid decline in cash reserves from $1.3B in Q2 2025 to $544.8M in Q2 2026, as per the balance sheet, indicates a cash runway of only a few quarters at the current burn rate. The negative free cash flow margin of -22.3% in Q2 2026, while improved from -194.6% a year earlier, still shows significant cash consumption, and the company's reliance on external financing is evident. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a delay in Brensocatib approval or a revenue shortfall, the liquidity position could deteriorate quickly, warranting close monitoring of cash burn and potential capital raises.
Misapplied Metric: P/E on Negative Earnings
The P/E ratio of -19.30 is meaningless for a company with negative earnings, per the valuation data, and obscures the true value driver, which is the pipeline's potential.
For a biotech like Insmed, the P/E ratio is not applicable because earnings are negative and heavily influenced by non-cash charges and one-time items. Instead, investors should focus on EV/Sales or EV/EBITDA (though EBITDA is also negative) and, more importantly, on risk-adjusted net present value (rNPV) of the pipeline, particularly Brensocatib. The P/S ratio of 44.23 reflects the market's premium for future growth, but it does not capture the commercial complexity of the bronchiectasis market or the potential for ARIKAYCE label expansion. A more appropriate metric would be the ratio of enterprise value to peak sales estimates for the pipeline, adjusted for probability of success, which provides a clearer picture of valuation relative to the company's growth potential.