Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.0x · EV/EBITDA 13.5x · ROE 42.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $142.7B | $118.8B | $69.7B | $64.4B | $44.4B | $45.4B | $47.9B | $31.3B | $22.6B | $34.9B | $23.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $145.8B | $121.9B | $73.5B | $70.2B | $49.5B | $49.9B | $53.3B | $37.3B | $27.8B | $39.9B | $28.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.04 | 27.06 | 21.07 | 26.51 | 16.86 | 13.38 | 30.54 | 21.06 | 14.64 | 48.05 | 30.40 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.34 | 8.85 | 6.10 | 6.50 | 4.42 | 4.15 | 6.00 | 4.29 | 3.19 | 5.25 | 4.37 |
| P/B Ratio | 12.63 | 10.70 | 7.55 | 8.60 | 5.46 | 5.53 | 6.59 | 4.56 | 3.42 | 5.68 | 4.01 |
| P/FCF | 22.08 | 34.68 | 20.54 | 25.10 | 23.97 | 13.36 | 21.87 | 25.96 | 20.33 | 36.63 | — |
| P/OCF | 30.04 | 25.01 | 15.77 | 18.01 | 15.86 | 10.58 | 17.22 | 16.35 | 10.13 | 17.66 | 25.48 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 9.09 | 6.42 | 7.10 | 4.92 | 4.56 | 6.67 | 5.12 | 3.91 | 5.99 | 5.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.53 | 15.49 | 11.48 | 13.97 | 9.46 | 7.26 | 13.67 | 10.61 | 7.81 | 12.12 | 13.04 |
| EV / EBIT | 20.83 | 17.05 | 12.91 | 16.40 | 10.78 | 8.24 | 17.11 | 13.49 | 9.68 | 15.28 | 18.70 |
| EV / FCF | — | 35.58 | 21.64 | 27.39 | 26.69 | 14.67 | 24.31 | 30.99 | 24.92 | 41.83 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 56.7% | 49.7% | 43.6% | 45.4% | 56.6% | 40.7% | 39.6% | 42.0% | 40.6% | 30.8% |
| Operating Margin | 52.2% | 52.2% | 48.6% | 42.4% | 44.1% | 55.5% | 39.1% | 37.8% | 40.6% | 39.4% | 29.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 32.3% | 32.3% | 29.5% | 24.5% | 26.3% | 31.1% | 19.7% | 20.4% | 21.7% | 10.9% | 14.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 42.6% | 42.6% | 40.4% | 31.0% | 32.3% | 43.9% | 22.2% | 22.1% | 24.2% | 12.1% | 13.9% |
| ROA | 21.6% | 21.6% | 19.1% | 14.3% | 14.8% | 19.3% | 9.4% | 9.6% | 10.9% | 5.4% | 6.0% |
| ROIC | 38.6% | 38.6% | 31.6% | 23.7% | 25.7% | 36.0% | 18.3% | 16.8% | 18.9% | 17.6% | 10.6% |
| ROCE | 39.2% | 39.2% | 34.9% | 26.7% | 27.6% | 38.4% | 20.5% | 19.5% | 22.3% | 21.1% | 13.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 1.16 | 0.90 | 0.97 | 1.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.09 | 1.40 | 1.36 | 1.09 | 1.93 | 2.27 | 1.68 | 1.81 | 2.68 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.92 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.58 | 1.17 | 0.96 | 0.65 | 1.37 | 1.72 | 1.44 | 1.51 | 2.44 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.91 | 1.10 | 2.29 | 2.71 | 1.31 | 2.44 | 5.03 | 4.59 | 5.20 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 19.37 | 19.37 | 17.04 | 13.11 | 13.49 | 16.95 | 8.49 | 8.12 | 10.34 | 8.53 | 5.32 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.89 | 3.89 | 2.75 | 3.19 | 4.20 | 2.73 | 3.48 | 2.83 | 2.62 | 2.71 | 2.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.40 | 3.40 | 2.28 | 2.46 | 3.38 | 2.30 | 2.79 | 2.11 | 1.77 | 1.82 | 1.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.29 | 2.29 | 1.56 | 1.26 | 1.84 | 1.55 | 1.87 | 1.36 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.58 | 0.60 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.41 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.50 | 5.50 | 5.48 | 5.48 | 5.41 | 4.88 | 4.99 | 4.12 | 3.98 | 3.79 | 3.68 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.01 | 39.71 | 45.30 | 53.54 | 48.29 | 51.96 | 45.68 | 50.02 | 53.56 | 45.36 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 4.8% | 6.1% | 5.4% | 2.4% | 4.1% | 4.8% | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 57.3% | 57.3% | 48.5% | 127.5% | 102.6% | 72.8% | 73.8% | 85.7% | 70.1% | 62.6% | 17.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 3.7% | 4.7% | 3.8% | 5.9% | 7.5% | 3.3% | 4.7% | 6.8% | 2.1% | 3.3% |
| FCF Yield | 4.5% | 2.9% | 4.9% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 7.5% | 4.6% | 3.9% | 4.9% | 2.7% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.3% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 4.8% | 6.1% | 5.4% | 2.4% | 4.1% | 4.8% | 1.3% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $838M | $786M | $786M | $773M | $773M | $773M | $773M | $773M | $773M | $774M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SCCO stock.
Southern Copper Corporation's current P/E ratio is 22.0x. The historical average is 20.8x. This places it at the 67th percentile of its historical range.
Southern Copper Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 13.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.1x.
Southern Copper Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 42.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 28.8%.
Based on historical data, Southern Copper Corporation is trading at a P/E of 22.0x. This is at the 67th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Southern Copper Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.77% with a payout ratio of 57.3%.
Southern Copper Corporation has 56.7% gross margin and 52.2% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Southern Copper Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.9x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Copper price correction compressing margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Beyond Copper Peers
Southern Copper's 37.10x trailing P/E and 47.34x price-to-free-cash-flow multiples compress to 24.63x and 13.78x on forward estimates, while the 14.68x price-to-book sits roughly 4.7x above Freeport-McMoRan's 3.09x, making it the richest-priced major in the copper peer set, according to current valuation data.
The 21.01x EV/EBITDA stands well above Freeport-McMoRan's 12.06x and Teck's 12.97x, a spread that appears to reflect a scarcity premium for reserve longevity rather than superior near-term cash generation, since forward EV/EBITDA of 13.78x implies the market expects EBITDA to keep expanding. The 1.78 PEG suggests investors are underwriting roughly 20% earnings growth off trailing figures, which would likely require copper prices to hold near current levels; a cyclical reversal would compress both the denominator and the multiple simultaneously. The 1.5% yield sits below peers' payout histories relative to price, indicating the premium is being paid for capital appreciation rather than income.
Record Margins From Cost Position
Southern Copper's gross margin reached 66.0% and net margin 38.4% in 2026Q3, up roughly 1,780 basis points and 990 basis points respectively from 2024Q4 levels, with operating margin at 59.9% in that same quarter, as reported in quarterly ratio disclosures.
The 59.9% operating margin against a 66.0% gross margin implies corporate overhead remains negligible, consistent with the reported SG&A running under 1% of revenue, so essentially all of the margin expansion appears to be coming from realized copper pricing and by-product credits rather than cost discipline at the center. Net margin of 38.4% versus peer averages in the 8-25% range suggests first-quartile cash cost positioning is genuinely translating to the bottom line, but the gap is so wide that investors should treat it as price-dependent and monitor cash cost per pound for evidence of structural durability. Because depreciation of roughly $210-230M per quarter is being carried at a modest absolute level relative to sales, reported margins may also flatter true economic earning power if sustaining capital eventually rises to match the asset base.
Returns Driven by Margin, Not Turnover
Southern Copper's ROIC climbed from 7.5% in 2024Q4 to 12.9% in 2026Q3 while asset turnover moved only from 0.15x to 0.19x, indicating margin expansion rather than capital efficiency drove the improvement, based on Southern Copper's reported quarterly ratios across the ten-quarter window.
ROE of 13.7% against ROIC of 12.9% shows a narrow spread, meaning modest leverage of 0.63x debt-to-equity is contributing little to shareholder returns, so the compounding is coming almost entirely from the 66.0% gross margin rather than balance sheet engineering. ROIC of 12.9% is essentially in line with Freeport-McMoRan's 12.8% despite SCCO's far richer P/B, which suggests the market is paying in advance for return persistence that has not yet differentiated itself on a capital-efficiency basis. Asset turnover of 0.19x remains low in absolute terms, typical for a mining asset base where reserves are held on balance sheet for decades, so further ROIC gains would likely require either higher copper prices or a step-up in productive throughput.
Working Capital Cycle Tightens
Southern Copper's cash conversion cycle shortened from 76 days in 2024Q3 to 51 days in 2026Q3, driven by payables stretching from 40 to 54 days while days inventory outstanding fell from 64 to 61, per quarterly working capital disclosures.
DSO declining from 52 to 44 days suggests tightening collection terms or a customer base with strong payment discipline, which reinforces the earnings quality observation that operating cash flow has exceeded net income in nine of the last ten quarters. The 14-day extension in DPO accounts for the majority of the cycle improvement, and while this may reflect genuine supplier leverage given the company's scale, it could also reflect timing effects that will not repeat, so the 51-day CCC should not be extrapolated linearly. Given the documented $900M-plus swings in working capital line items across the period, quarterly free cash flow margins ranging from 12.9% to 56.7% should be read as noisy rather than as a clean trend.
Coverage Doubles as Debt Relaxes
Debt-to-equity eased from 0.82 to 0.63 while interest coverage nearly doubled to 28.47x from 15.26x over ten quarters, a trend that suggests debt service has become materially more comfortable for the Mexican and Peruvian producer, based on its reported quarterly balance sheets.
D/EBITDA falling from 4.60x to 2.95x while gross debt actually rose from about $7.0B to $8.5B indicates the ratio improvement is entirely a function of EBITDA growth and the cash build to roughly $4.8B, not debt repayment, so leverage could re-lever quickly if copper prices correct. Interest coverage of 28.47x and a net debt position near $3.7B leave ample refinancing headroom and no apparent near-term covenant pressure, which supports the balance sheet signal despite the elevated payout. The practical risk is not solvency but cyclicality: at trough EBITDA the same debt load has historically pushed D/EBITDA back above 4x, which would matter for dividend sustainability rather than debt service.
Trailing P/E Misreads Cyclical Peaks
The trailing P/E of 37.10x is the ratio most often misapplied to Southern Copper, since record copper prices are inflating the denominator, yet even the 24.63x forward P/E stays well above Hudbay's 16.02x, per current peer multiples.
A trailing P/E on a miner with 66.0% gross margins at what appear to be favorable copper prices obscures mean reversion: if margins normalize toward the 48-50% range seen in 2024, the effective multiple paid on through-cycle earnings is materially higher than 37x suggests. The preferred adjustment is EV/EBITDA struck against normalized copper prices, or free cash flow yield measured over a full cycle, and here the 47.34x price-to-free-cash-flow figure is more informative because it captures the heavy working capital and dividend outflows that P/E ignores. Investors should also weigh price per recoverable reserve tonne, since the 14.68x P/B premium may be rational if reserve life extends into the 2050s, but P/B tells you nothing about whether Tia Maria volumes ever materialize to convert those reserves into cash.