Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 7.1x · EV/EBITDA 5.0x · ROE 21.3%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.0B | $29.9B | $26.0B | $16.2B | $15.9B | $26.4B | $20.5B | $24.3B | $17.5B | $30.9B | $30.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $24.2B | $30.1B | $26.8B | $17.9B | $19.8B | $32.6B | $24.8B | $32.0B | $32.1B | $40.1B | $41.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | 7.13 | 8.98 | 7.60 | 7.36 | 5.34 | 6.32 | 15.29 | 6.48 | 6.27 | 15.95 | 13.38 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.60 | 1.99 | 1.61 | 1.19 | 1.36 | 2.59 | 1.84 | 1.82 | 1.32 | 2.50 | 2.75 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.57 | 1.78 | 1.57 | 1.16 | 1.23 | 1.93 | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.19 | 2.17 | 2.12 |
| P/FCF | 2.51 | 3.03 | 2.64 | 1.88 | 2.37 | 3.72 | 2.74 | 2.70 | 1.88 | 3.46 | 4.42 |
| P/OCF | 2.44 | 3.03 | 2.64 | 1.88 | 2.37 | 3.72 | 2.74 | 2.70 | 1.88 | 3.46 | 4.42 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.01 | 1.66 | 1.31 | 1.69 | 3.20 | 2.22 | 2.40 | 2.42 | 3.24 | 3.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.05 | 5.85 | 5.32 | 5.32 | 4.52 | 5.53 | 11.36 | 6.09 | 8.14 | 11.20 | 10.82 |
| EV / EBIT | 5.24 | 6.51 | 5.88 | 6.16 | 4.99 | 5.92 | 13.78 | 6.54 | 8.82 | 12.06 | 11.48 |
| EV / FCF | — | 3.05 | 2.72 | 2.08 | 2.96 | 4.59 | 3.31 | 3.56 | 3.44 | 4.49 | 6.01 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.1% | 65.1% | 58.2% | 56.2% | 71.1% | 92.9% | 52.4% | 68.6% | 58.3% | 57.2% | 63.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.8% | 30.8% | 28.2% | 21.3% | 33.9% | 54.0% | 16.1% | 36.7% | 27.4% | 26.9% | 32.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 23.7% | 23.7% | 21.7% | 16.4% | 25.8% | 41.4% | 12.4% | 28.1% | 21.0% | 15.6% | 20.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 21.3% | 21.3% | 23.0% | 16.7% | 22.7% | 32.0% | 10.0% | 25.2% | 19.3% | 13.6% | 16.8% |
| ROA | 3.0% | 3.0% | 3.0% | 2.0% | 3.0% | 4.4% | 1.4% | 3.5% | 2.8% | 2.1% | 2.6% |
| ROIC | 10.8% | 10.8% | 11.0% | 7.6% | 10.8% | 14.6% | 4.2% | 10.0% | 7.4% | 7.2% | 7.5% |
| ROCE | 12.3% | 12.3% | 12.4% | 9.2% | 14.3% | 19.4% | 5.7% | 13.3% | 9.9% | 9.6% | 10.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 1.15 | 1.10 | 1.06 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.63 | 1.46 | 1.42 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.96 | 2.96 | 3.07 | 4.75 | 3.24 | 2.46 | 7.24 | 3.78 | 6.08 | 5.81 | 5.32 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.30 | 0.45 | 0.33 | 0.51 | 0.99 | 0.65 | 0.76 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.51 | 0.89 | 1.05 | 1.95 | 1.47 | 3.70 | 2.57 | 2.86 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.58 | 0.87 | 0.57 | 0.86 | 1.56 | 1.03 | 1.59 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 2.60 | 5.33 | 1.08 | 2.13 | 1.95 | 2.39 | 2.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 2.5% | 2.7% | 1.9% | 2.5% | 2.4% | 3.0% | 1.4% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 12.0% | 12.0% | 11.4% | 18.1% | 14.4% | 11.8% | 37.5% | 15.5% | 19.1% | 23.0% | 9.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 14.0% | 11.1% | 13.2% | 13.6% | 18.7% | 15.8% | 6.5% | 15.4% | 15.9% | 6.3% | 7.5% |
| FCF Yield | 39.8% | 33.0% | 37.8% | 53.1% | 42.1% | 26.9% | 36.5% | 37.1% | 53.3% | 28.9% | 22.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 12.3% | 9.9% | 3.9% | 6.9% | 20.9% | 10.9% | 4.8% | 14.9% | 10.7% | 4.8% | 1.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 13.9% | 11.3% | 5.4% | 9.4% | 23.6% | 12.8% | 7.3% | 17.3% | 13.7% | 6.3% | 2.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $358M | $401M | $424M | $483M | $569M | $591M | $674M | $747M | $800M | $832M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SYF stock.
Synchrony Financial's current P/E ratio is 7.1x. The historical average is 9.6x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
Synchrony Financial's current EV/EBITDA is 5.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.9x.
Synchrony Financial's return on equity (ROE) is 21.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 23.5%.
Based on historical data, Synchrony Financial is trading at a P/E of 7.1x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Synchrony Financial's current dividend yield is 1.62% with a payout ratio of 12.0%.
Synchrony Financial has 65.1% gross margin and 30.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Synchrony Financial's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.0x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Reliance on declining provisions
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Book Value Against Modest Returns
At a price-to-book of 1.57 and P/TBV near 1.58 against a 5.3% ROE, Synchrony trades at the top of its peer group while generating the lowest returns; as compiled in the current valuation metrics, the 7.93x trailing P/E embeds a credit-cost normalization not yet tested.
Tangible book value per share advanced from $33.51 to $46.65 over the ten-quarter window, a 39% gain that occurred while roughly $6.5 billion of stock was repurchased, so per-share book growth is being manufactured as much by capital return as by retained earnings. At $73.64 the shares therefore sit at approximately 1.58x tangible book versus 1.38x for Bread Financial and 0.96x for Capital One, a premium that would ordinarily signal franchise quality but sits uncomfortably beside an ROE of 5.3%. Investors should treat the multiple as pricing a recovery in returns on tangible equity that has not yet appeared in reported profitability, and monitor whether that recovery arrives through revenue rather than reserve release.
Leverage Earns Only a Fraction of Peers
SYF's 5.3% ROE compares unfavourably with Bread Financial's 17.0% and Capital One's 9.3%, while its 0.7% ROA and 14% equity-to-assets suggest the shortfall is driven by earnings power rather than balance-sheet leverage, according to the latest quarterly ratio disclosure.
Decomposing the 2026Q3 return, a 0.7% ROA multiplied by an equity multiplier of roughly 7.1x (from the 0.14 equity-to-assets ratio) reconciles closely to the reported 5.3% ROE, confirming that leverage is already contributing its maximum arithmetic push and the constraint sits in asset-level returns. The fee contribution is structurally negative at -26.0% of revenue because Retailer Share Arrangement payments are netted inside the revenue line rather than expensed, so Synchrony's reported margin profile understates gross lending economics while simultaneously showing that partner economics claim a growing share of the spread. ROA has drifted between 0.5% and 0.9% without a sustained upward trend, which suggests profitability quality is being sustained by provision outcomes rather than by improving core spread or fee generation.
Stable Spread Masks Funding Pressure
NIM has oscillated between 3.7% and 4.0% for ten quarters, ending at 3.9% in 2026Q3, while the efficiency ratio drifted from 31.2% to 35.9%, suggesting deposit costs are rising faster than asset yields can offset, per the reported quarterly ratios.
The narrow NIM band indicates that private-label card yields and online-bank funding costs are resetting in rough lockstep, so the spread engine is neither expanding nor contracting materially; given Synchrony's digital-first deposit base, investors should monitor whether deposit beta keeps the funding leg sticky even if policy rates ease. The efficiency ratio's climb from 31.2% in 2024Q3 to 35.9% in 2026Q3 implies operating leverage is running in reverse, with technology and platform investment not yet translating into scale economics. The 80.3% reading in 2026Q1 stands well apart from the 31%-37% band of neighbouring quarters and appears to reflect a period-specific item rather than a change in the underlying cost structure, so it should be treated as an outlier in any trend extrapolation.
Capital Return Consumes Retained Earnings
Equity-to-total-assets has held at 0.14 for ten quarters even as buybacks absorbed roughly $6.5 billion, leaving the equity base at $16.6 billion against $122.5 billion of assets; based on disclosed quarterly balance sheet data, capital generation appears recycled rather than accumulated.
The supplied data does not include CET1, Tier 1 or total capital ratios, so regulatory headroom and buffers cannot be assessed directly here; on the equity-to-assets measure that is available, the ratio has not improved despite positive earnings, which is consistent with repurchases and dividends consuming retained capital at close to the rate it is generated. With total assets flat inside a $117 billion-$122.5 billion band, the balance sheet is currently sized to the existing equity base rather than being expanded, implying that any re-acceleration in loan growth would require either slower capital return or fresh equity. A 1.6% dividend yield alongside $1.1 billion of buybacks in 2026Q3 against roughly $892 million of quarterly net income suggests the return programme is running ahead of earnings, and investors should watch whether this pace proves sustainable if provisions rise again.
Premium Book Value, Discounted Earnings Power
Synchrony's 1.57 price-to-book is the highest among the comparison set versus Bread Financial at 1.38, Capital One at 0.96 and Ally at 0.79, yet its 5.3% ROE trails every peer, according to the peer comparison table.
The gap appears at least partly structural: Synchrony's retailer share economics are netted against revenue and its private-label focus carries a different fee mix from general-purpose issuers, which depresses reported ROE relative to a peer like Bread Financial at 17.0% that carries a 1.32 debt-to-equity ratio and thus more leverage in its return stack. What is cyclical rather than structural is the credit-cost component, since a 24% reduction in provisions has already flattered recent earnings across the consumer-lending group, so peer ROE comparisons taken at a single point may converge if charge-offs normalise together. The supplied peer table does not include a leverage or capital-ratio comparison for Synchrony itself, so the portion of the ROE differential attributable to capital structure warrants separate verification rather than assumption.
Why the Cheap P/E Misleads
Synchrony's 7.93x trailing P/E is the ratio most often misapplied to this bank, because reported earnings improved alongside a 24% decline in provisions rather than revenue growth, making price-to-tangible-book the more reliable anchor for normalization.
The P/E flatters the investment case because the earnings denominator has been lifted by reserve release while net interest income growth decelerated from 6.9% to 1.9%, so the apparent discount to a 7.77x forward multiple may simply reflect a market that does not believe the provision floor holds; a price-to-tangible-book multiple struck against a mid-cycle ROTCE would remove this distortion. A secondary trap is reading leverage-adjusted ROE at 14% equity-to-assets as evidence of efficiency, since that same thin equity base amplifies losses in a downturn and is being actively reduced by buybacks rather than built by earnings. Investors should therefore anchor on P/TBV with normalized credit costs, and treat the headline P/E and the negative fee-income line, which embeds RSA netting, as figures that obscure rather than reveal the underlying economics.