Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DIBS vs LOVE vs W vs RH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
DIBS vs LOVE vs W vs RH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $163M | $228M | $8.71B | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $89M | $690M | $12.66B | $3.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $13M | $-305M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 72.7% | 57.7% | 30.1% | 44.5% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | 6.3% | 1.1% | 10.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.7x | 23.6x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $183M | $4.07B | $3.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $84M | $1.48B | $30M |
DIBS vs LOVE vs W vs RH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1stdibs.Com, Inc. (DIBS) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 19.6 | -80.4% |
| Wayfair Inc. (W) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 19.7 | -80.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DIBS vs LOVE vs W vs RH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DIBS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.21
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 3.93x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 3.93x
- Beta 1.21 vs W's 2.85
LOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 2.6% ROA vs DIBS's -13.2%, ROIC 3.3% vs -18.3%
W has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 39.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 67.0% 10Y total return vs RH's 257.5%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs LOVE's -2.8%
- +117.4% vs RH's -29.3%
RH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (19.3x vs 23.6x)
- 3.2% margin vs DIBS's -19.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs LOVE's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.3x vs 23.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs DIBS's -19.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs W's 2.85 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.4% vs RH's -29.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs DIBS's -13.2%, ROIC 3.3% vs -18.3% |
DIBS vs LOVE vs W vs RH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DIBS vs LOVE vs W vs RH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RH leads in 2 of 6 categories
LOVE leads 1 • W leads 1 • DIBS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
W is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.7B annually — 141.6x DIBS's $89M. RH is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DIBS's -19.9%. On growth, RH holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $89M | $690M | $12.7B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $58M | $428M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $13M | -$305M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$11M | $456M | $128M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +57.7% | +30.1% | +44.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | +6.3% | +1.1% | +10.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.9% | +1.9% | -2.4% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | -1.5% | +3.6% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +2.5% | +7.4% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | -18.4% | +10.1% | +10.2% |
Valuation Metrics
LOVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, LOVE trades at a 39% valuation discount to RH's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOVE's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than W's 35.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $163M | $228M | $8.7B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $159M | $327M | $11.3B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.10x | 22.64x | -27.36x | 36.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.68x | 23.63x | 19.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.54x | 35.11x | 14.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 0.34x | 0.70x | 0.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.70x | 1.21x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.06x | 18.78x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-19 for DIBS. DIBS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), W scores 7/9 vs RH's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.0% | +6.5% | — | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | +2.6% | -9.6% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.3% | +3.3% | — | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.4% | +3.6% | +1.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.85x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $99M | $2.6B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $84M | $1.5B | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $183M | $4.1B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -0.63x | 1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
W leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in W five years ago would be worth $2,167 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,565 for DIBS. Over the past 12 months, W leads with a +117.4% total return vs RH's -29.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors W at 18.3% vs RH's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.4% | +8.2% | -37.9% | -30.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.9% | -23.5% | +117.4% | -29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.3% | -40.1% | +65.6% | -48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -78.4% | -78.3% | -80.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -34.9% | +67.0% | +257.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.7% | -15.7% | +18.3% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIBS and LOVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DIBS is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than W's 2.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOVE currently trades 71.3% from its 52-week high vs RH's 52.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.33x | 2.85x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.62 | $21.90 | $119.98 | $257.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.35 | $10.33 | $29.75 | $106.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.3% | +71.3% | +55.2% | +52.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.6 | 53.7 | 38.6 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 178K | 299K | 3.6M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DIBS as "Buy", LOVE as "Buy", W as "Buy", RH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.0% upside for DIBS (target: $7) vs 44.0% for LOVE (target: $23).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $22.50 | $100.07 | $208.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 11 | 57 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.0% | +8.7% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
RH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LOVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DIBS vs LOVE vs W vs RH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DIBS or LOVE or W or RH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wayfair Inc.
(W) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). The Lovesac Company (LOVE) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (25. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate 1stdibs. Com, Inc. (DIBS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DIBS or LOVE or W or RH?
On trailing P/E, The Lovesac Company (LOVE) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Rh at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Rh is actually cheaper at 19. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DIBS or LOVE or W or RH?
Over the past 5 years, Wayfair Inc.
(W) delivered a total return of -78. 3%, compared to -84. 4% for 1stdibs. Com, Inc. (DIBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RH returned +257. 5% versus DIBS's -84. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DIBS or LOVE or W or RH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 1stdibs.
Com, Inc. (DIBS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Wayfair Inc. 's 2. 85β — meaning W is approximately 135% more volatile than DIBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 1stdibs. Com, Inc. (DIBS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DIBS or LOVE or W or RH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wayfair Inc.
(W) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus -2. 8% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wayfair Inc. grew EPS 39. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DIBS or LOVE or W or RH?
Rh (RH) is the more profitable company, earning 2.
3% net margin versus -21. 1% for 1stdibs. Com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RH leads at 10. 1% versus -29. 7% for DIBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DIBS leads at 71. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DIBS or LOVE or W or RH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rh (RH) trades at 19.
3x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIBS: 57. 0% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DIBS or LOVE or W or RH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DIBS or LOVE or W or RH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 1stdibs.
Com, Inc. (DIBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21)). Wayfair Inc. (W) carries a higher beta of 2. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DIBS: -84. 4%, W: +67. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DIBS and LOVE and W and RH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.