Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INLX vs BOX vs DOCU vs MSFT vs CRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
INLX vs BOX vs DOCU vs MSFT vs CRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $31M | $3.71B | $9.47B | $3.08T | $174.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $1.18B | $3.22B | $318.27B | $41.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $101M | $309M | $125.22B | $7.46B |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 79.2% | 79.4% | 68.3% | 77.7% |
| Operating Margin | -9.6% | 7.1% | 9.3% | 46.8% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.0x | 12.7x | 24.8x | 15.4x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $77M | $185M | $112.18B | $6.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $375M | $602M | $30.24B | $7.33B |
INLX vs BOX vs DOCU vs MSFT vs CRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| Box, Inc. (BOX) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) | 100 | 34.3 | -65.7% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 226.5 | +126.5% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 104.0 | +4.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INLX vs BOX vs DOCU vs MSFT vs CRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INLX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BOX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 39.1%, current ratio 1.11x
- Beta 0.42, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.11x
- Beta 0.42 vs DOCU's 0.88
DOCU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 24.8x)
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.4%
- 7.8% 10Y total return vs CRM's 148.6%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs INLX's 6.7%
- 39.3% margin vs INLX's -10.4%
CRM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
- PEG 1.26 vs MSFT's 1.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs INLX's 6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs INLX's -10.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs DOCU's 0.88 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs CRM's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.5% vs INLX's -52.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs INLX's -9.6%, ROIC 24.9% vs -1.0% |
INLX vs BOX vs DOCU vs MSFT vs CRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INLX vs BOX vs DOCU vs MSFT vs CRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
INLX leads 0 • BOX leads 0 • DOCU leads 0 • CRM leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 19243.0x INLX's $17M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INLX's -10.4%. On growth, MSFT holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $1.2B | $3.2B | $318.3B | $41.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$315,994 | $120M | $525M | $192.6B | $11.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $101M | $309M | $125.2B | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $994,076 | $350M | $1.1B | $72.9B | $14.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +79.2% | +79.4% | +68.3% | +77.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +7.1% | +9.3% | +46.8% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +8.6% | +9.6% | +39.3% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +29.8% | +32.9% | +22.9% | +34.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | +9.4% | +7.8% | +18.3% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | -58.0% | +12.8% | +23.4% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INLX and DOCU each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.3x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 47% valuation discount to BOX's 43.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MSFT offers better value at 1.62x vs CRM's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $3.7B | $9.5B | $3.08T | $174.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $3.4B | $9.1B | $3.17T | $174.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -52.77x | 43.59x | 32.36x | 30.43x | 23.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.98x | 12.65x | 24.77x | 15.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.62x | 1.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.97x | 28.35x | 17.24x | 19.46x | 19.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.71x | 3.15x | 2.94x | 10.94x | 4.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.71x | 19.11x | 5.11x | 9.02x | 2.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.14x | 10.58x | 8.95x | 43.06x | 12.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BOX and DOCU and MSFT and CRM each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOX delivers a 47.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-16 for INLX. DOCU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOX's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRM scores 8/9 vs MSFT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.6% | +47.9% | +15.6% | +33.1% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +6.3% | +7.7% | +19.2% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +64.7% | +15.0% | +24.9% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +11.2% | +13.7% | +29.7% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.39x | 0.10x | 0.33x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$298M | -$417M | $81.9B | -$590M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $375M | $602M | $30.2B | $7.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $77M | $185M | $112.2B | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.28x | 9.68x | 131.77x | 55.65x | 44.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,377 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,521 for DOCU. Over the past 12 months, MSFT leads with a -4.5% total return vs INLX's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INLX at 17.6% vs CRM's -2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -10.8% | -26.1% | -12.0% | -28.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.6% | -18.1% | -43.1% | -4.5% | -34.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | -4.3% | -2.8% | +37.6% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.5% | +14.6% | -74.8% | +73.8% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +122.1% | +20.6% | +776.0% | +148.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | -1.5% | -1.0% | +11.2% | -2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INLX and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DOCU's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSFT currently trades 74.7% from its 52-week high vs INLX's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.44x | 0.42x | 0.88x | 0.85x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.57 | $38.80 | $94.67 | $555.45 | $296.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.74 | $21.34 | $40.16 | $356.28 | $163.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.1% | +66.3% | +50.6% | +74.7% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 60.1 | 54.4 | 57.9 | 53.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 2.3M | 4.2M | 32.5M | 12.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MSFT and CRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOX as "Buy", DOCU as "Hold", MSFT as "Buy", CRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for CRM (target: $287) vs 34.2% for MSFT (target: $557). For income investors, CRM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.91% vs BOX's 0.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.67 | $68.67 | $556.88 | $287.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 28 | 81 | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | +0.8% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | — | 19 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.10 | — | $3.23 | $1.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.8% | +9.2% | +0.6% | +7.2% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
INLX vs BOX vs DOCU vs MSFT vs CRM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Box, Inc. (BOX) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 23. 3x versus Box, Inc. at 43. 6x. On forward P/E, DocuSign, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Salesforce, Inc. wins at 1. 26x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +73.
8%, compared to -74. 8% for DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +776. 0% versus INLX's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellinetics, Inc.
(INLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 44β versus DocuSign, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning DOCU is approximately -297% more volatile than INLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 39% for Box, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.
9% versus 6. 7% for Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Salesforce, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -218. 2% for Intellinetics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INLX leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -3. 0% for Intellinetics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -1. 0% for INLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCU leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, DocuSign, Inc. (DOCU) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Microsoft Corporation — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRM: 57. 8% to $287. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM?
In this comparison, CRM (0.
9% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield), BOX (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. INLX, DOCU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INLX or BOX or DOCU or MSFT or CRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellinetics, Inc.
(INLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 44)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INLX: -99. 8%, DOCU: +20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INLX and BOX and DOCU and MSFT and CRM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MSFT, CRM pay a dividend while INLX, BOX, DOCU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.