Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KVYO vs HUBS vs CRM vs DDOG vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
KVYO vs HUBS vs CRM vs DDOG vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $4.60B | $10.16B | $174.91B | $71.25B | $4.85T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $3.30B | $41.52B | $3.67B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $100M | $7.46B | $136M | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | 83.7% | 77.7% | 79.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 1.9% | 21.5% | -0.7% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.9x | 15.2x | 15.4x | 86.9x | 28.9x |
| Total Debt | $121M | $485M | $6.74B | $1.54B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.06B | $882M | $7.33B | $401M | $30.71B |
KVYO vs HUBS vs CRM vs DDOG vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 40.1 | -59.9% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 219.7 | +119.7% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 306.2 | +206.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KVYO vs HUBS vs CRM vs DDOG vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KVYO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 31.6%, EPS growth 35.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 4.27x
- 31.6% revenue growth vs CRM's 9.6%
HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 86.9x)
CRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
- Beta 0.75, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.76x
- Beta 0.75 vs DDOG's 1.33, lower leverage
- 0.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, DDOG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs DDOG's 433.0%
- PEG 0.97 vs CRM's 1.26
- 37.9% margin vs KVYO's -0.7%
- +160.3% vs HUBS's -70.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.6% revenue growth vs CRM's 9.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 86.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs KVYO's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs DDOG's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.3% vs HUBS's -70.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs KVYO's -0.6%, ROIC 25.1% vs -22.2% |
KVYO vs HUBS vs CRM vs DDOG vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KVYO vs HUBS vs CRM vs DDOG vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRM leads in 2 of 6 categories
GOOGL leads 2 • KVYO leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • DDOG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HUBS and GOOGL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 322.0x KVYO's $1.3B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KVYO's -0.7%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $3.3B | $41.5B | $3.7B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $166M | $11.4B | $73M | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $100M | $7.5B | $136M | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224M | $712M | $14.4B | $1.1B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.6% | +83.7% | +77.7% | +79.9% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +1.9% | +21.5% | -0.7% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +3.0% | +18.0% | +3.7% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +21.6% | +34.7% | +29.4% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.9% | +23.4% | +12.1% | +32.2% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +160.0% | +2.5% | +18.3% | +120.9% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CRM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.3x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 97% valuation discount to DDOG's 667.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.24x vs CRM's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $10.2B | $174.9B | $71.2B | $4.85T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $9.8B | $174.3B | $72.4B | $4.88T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -138.18x | 229.47x | 23.31x | 667.20x | 37.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.90x | 15.21x | 15.44x | 86.87x | 28.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.91x | — | 1.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 55.50x | 19.55x | 926.09x | 32.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.73x | 3.24x | 4.21x | 20.79x | 12.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.70x | 5.08x | 2.94x | 19.49x | 11.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.26x | 14.36x | 12.14x | 71.21x | 66.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-1 for KVYO. KVYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DDOG's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRM scores 8/9 vs KVYO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.8% | +5.0% | +12.6% | +3.8% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +2.7% | +6.6% | +2.1% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.2% | +0.4% | +10.9% | -0.8% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.7% | +0.5% | +11.9% | -1.0% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.23x | 0.11x | 0.41x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$944M | -$397M | -$590M | $1.1B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $882M | $7.3B | $401M | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $121M | $485M | $6.7B | $1.5B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6749.00x | 44.14x | 4.46x | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $35,112 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,057 for HUBS. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +160.3% total return vs HUBS's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 55.1% vs HUBS's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.2% | -48.4% | -28.1% | +49.6% | +27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.3% | -70.1% | -34.4% | +83.3% | +160.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | -55.6% | -6.3% | +154.9% | +273.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | -59.4% | -13.3% | +160.4% | +251.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.6% | +359.7% | +148.6% | +433.0% | +1003.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.6% | -23.7% | -2.1% | +36.6% | +55.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRM and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDOG's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.01x | 0.75x | 1.33x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.79 | $682.57 | $296.05 | $201.69 | $402.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.96 | $180.50 | $163.52 | $98.01 | $152.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.2% | +28.9% | +61.4% | +99.2% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.9 | 55.6 | 53.0 | 83.9 | 83.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 1.5M | 12.1M | 5.1M | 28.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CRM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KVYO as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", CRM as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 108.1% upside for KVYO (target: $32) vs 1.4% for DDOG (target: $203). For income investors, CRM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.91% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.63 | $306.10 | $287.00 | $202.92 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 47 | 97 | 47 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.66 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.9% | +7.2% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
CRM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). GOOGL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
KVYO vs HUBS vs CRM vs DDOG vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Klaviyo, Inc.
(KVYO) is the stronger pick with 31. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 6% for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 23. 3x versus Datadog, Inc. at 667. 2x. On forward P/E, HubSpot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +251. 1%, compared to -59. 4% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +1004% versus KVYO's -53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Datadog, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning DDOG is approximately 77% more volatile than CRM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 41% for Datadog, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Klaviyo, Inc.
(KVYO) is pulling ahead at 31. 6% versus 9. 6% for Salesforce, Inc. (CRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KVYO leads at 37. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -2. 6% for Klaviyo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -5. 5% for KVYO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 86. 9x for Datadog, Inc. — 71. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KVYO: 108. 1% to $31. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL?
In this comparison, CRM (0.
9% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. KVYO, HUBS, DDOG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KVYO or HUBS or CRM or DDOG or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 0. 9% yield, +148. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +148. 6%, KVYO: -53. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KVYO and HUBS and CRM and DDOG and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (KVYO (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and CRM (Technology) and DDOG (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KVYO is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. CRM pays a dividend while KVYO, HUBS, DDOG, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.