Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Advertising Agencies
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Specialty Retail | Advertising Agencies | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $9M | $36M | $761M | $430M | $359M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $38M | $1.18B | $490M | $925M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-1M | $-30M | $20M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 75.1% | 73.8% | 10.5% | 69.9% | 76.6% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | -5.1% | 1.7% | 5.7% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | 3.5x | — | 10.5x | 21.9x | 11.2x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $3M | $10M | $19M | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $7M | $101M | $94M | $158M |
MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mannatech, Incorpor… (MTEX) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Natural Health Tren… (NHTC) | 100 | 43.8 | -56.2% |
| QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) | 100 | 131.8 | +31.8% |
| Nature's Sunshine P… (NATR) | 100 | 253.1 | +153.1% |
| USANA Health Scienc… (USNA) | 100 | 23.0 | -77.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27
- Lower P/E (3.5x vs 11.2x)
- Beta 0.27 vs USNA's 1.34
NHTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 13.4%, current ratio 2.50x
- Beta 0.58, yield 25.0%, current ratio 2.50x
- 25.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
QNST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
- 78.3% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7%
NATR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 180.2% 10Y total return vs QNST's 288.4%
- 4.1% margin vs NHTC's -3.0%
- +85.3% vs MTEX's -53.3%
- 7.6% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.8%
Among these 5 stocks, USNA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.3% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.5x vs 11.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs NHTC's -3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs USNA's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 25.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +85.3% vs MTEX's -53.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.8% |
MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NATR leads in 3 of 6 categories
MTEX leads 1 • NHTC leads 0 • QNST leads 0 • USNA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — QNST and NATR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QNST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 30.9x NHTC's $38M. NATR is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NHTC's -3.0%. On growth, QNST holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $38M | $1.2B | $490M | $925M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | -$2M | $26M | $38M | $91M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$1M | -$30M | $20M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$6M | $99M | $23M | $9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.1% | +73.8% | +10.5% | +69.9% | +76.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -5.1% | +1.7% | +5.7% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -3.0% | -2.6% | +4.1% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -16.5% | +8.4% | +4.7% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.1% | -14.3% | +28.3% | +8.5% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | -2.4% | +59.4% | +16.0% | -142.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MTEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, MTEX trades at a 98% valuation discount to QNST's 165.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTEX's 1.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QNST's 21.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $36M | $761M | $430M | $359M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $32M | $671M | $355M | $215M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.54x | -41.72x | 165.55x | 23.16x | 33.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 10.47x | 21.92x | 11.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.41x | — | 21.84x | 9.20x | 2.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.90x | 0.70x | 0.90x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 1.57x | 3.19x | 2.81x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.52x | — | 9.18x | 14.90x | 42.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NATR delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MTEX. USNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTEX's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QNST scores 8/9 vs NHTC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.8% | -4.9% | -11.1% | +12.1% | +1.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.9% | -2.9% | -5.9% | +7.6% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.3% | -6.5% | +2.8% | +21.0% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | -6.1% | +2.4% | +13.8% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.12x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$4M | -$91M | -$75M | -$144M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $7M | $101M | $94M | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $3M | $10M | $19M | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | — | 4.64x | 1100.81x | 50.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NATR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATR five years ago would be worth $11,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,999 for USNA. Over the past 12 months, NATR leads with a +85.3% total return vs MTEX's -53.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATR at 31.8% vs USNA's -33.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.1% | +7.1% | -5.1% | +17.1% | +0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.3% | -20.7% | -26.9% | +85.3% | -31.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.8% | -5.7% | +81.0% | +129.0% | -70.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.0% | -9.6% | -28.4% | +18.8% | -80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -63.6% | +288.4% | +180.2% | -68.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.8% | -1.9% | +21.9% | +31.8% | -33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MTEX and NATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USNA's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATR currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs MTEX's 37.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.27x | 0.58x | 1.23x | 0.62x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.45 | $6.00 | $18.41 | $28.14 | $38.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $2.40 | $10.29 | $12.90 | $16.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.5% | +53.3% | +72.6% | +87.2% | +50.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 57.9 | 53.3 | 49.6 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 25K | 673K | 103K | 118K |
Analyst Outlook
NATR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QNST as "Buy", NATR as "Buy", USNA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 79.9% upside for USNA (target: $35) vs -20.6% for NATR (target: $20). NHTC is the only dividend payer here at 25.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $15.00 | $19.50 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 13 | 4 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +25.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.80 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.8% | +7.7% |
NATR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MTEX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?
On trailing P/E, Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the cheapest at 3.
5x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 165. 6x. On forward P/E, QuinStreet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?
Over the past 5 years, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) delivered a total return of +18. 8%, compared to -80. 0% for USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QNST returned +288. 4% versus USNA's -68. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus USANA Health Sciences, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning USNA is approximately 402% more volatile than MTEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 78% for Mannatech, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mannatech, Incorporated grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -254. 0% for Natural Health Trends Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QNST leads at 23. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?
Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
(NATR) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 1% net margin versus -2. 2% for Natural Health Trends Corp. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USNA leads at 5. 5% versus -4. 5% for NHTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USNA leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USNA: 79. 9% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?
In this comparison, NHTC (25.
0% yield) pays a dividend. MTEX, QNST, NATR, USNA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Health Trends Corp.
(NHTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58), 25. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHTC: -63. 6%, USNA: -68. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTEX and NHTC and QNST and NATR and USNA?
These companies operate in different sectors (MTEX (Consumer Defensive) and NHTC (Consumer Cyclical) and QNST (Communication Services) and NATR (Consumer Defensive) and USNA (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MTEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; NHTC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NHTC pays a dividend while MTEX, QNST, NATR, USNA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.