Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MTEX
Mannatech, Incorporated

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9M
5Y Perf.-69.9%
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$36M
5Y Perf.-56.2%
QNST
QuinStreet, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$761M
5Y Perf.+31.8%
NATR
Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$430M
5Y Perf.+153.1%
USNA
USANA Health Sciences, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$359M
5Y Perf.-77.0%

MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MTEX logoMTEX
NHTC logoNHTC
QNST logoQNST
NATR logoNATR
USNA logoUSNA
IndustryHousehold & Personal ProductsSpecialty RetailAdvertising AgenciesPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$9M$36M$761M$430M$359M
Revenue (TTM)$110M$38M$1.18B$490M$925M
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-1M$-30M$20M$11M
Gross Margin75.1%73.8%10.5%69.9%76.6%
Operating Margin0.5%-5.1%1.7%5.7%5.5%
Forward P/E3.5x10.5x21.9x11.2x
Total Debt$7M$3M$10M$19M$14M
Cash & Equiv.$11M$7M$101M$94M$158M

MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MTEX
NHTC
QNST
NATR
USNA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Mannatech, Incorpor… (MTEX)10030.1-69.9%
Natural Health Tren… (NHTC)10043.8-56.2%
QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST)100131.8+31.8%
Nature's Sunshine P… (NATR)100253.1+153.1%
USANA Health Scienc… (USNA)10023.0-77.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NATR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Mannatech, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. NHTC and QNST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MTEX
Mannatech, Incorporated
The Income Pick

MTEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27
  • Lower P/E (3.5x vs 11.2x)
  • Beta 0.27 vs USNA's 1.34
Best for: income & stability
NHTC
Natural Health Trends Corp.
The Defensive Pick

NHTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 13.4%, current ratio 2.50x
  • Beta 0.58, yield 25.0%, current ratio 2.50x
  • 25.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
QNST
QuinStreet, Inc.
The Growth Play

QNST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
  • 78.3% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7%
Best for: growth exposure
NATR
Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NATR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 180.2% 10Y total return vs QNST's 288.4%
  • 4.1% margin vs NHTC's -3.0%
  • +85.3% vs MTEX's -53.3%
  • 7.6% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
USNA
USANA Health Sciences, Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, USNA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthQNST logoQNST78.3% revenue growth vs MTEX's -10.7%
ValueMTEX logoMTEXLower P/E (3.5x vs 11.2x)
Quality / MarginsNATR logoNATR4.1% margin vs NHTC's -3.0%
Stability / SafetyMTEX logoMTEXBeta 0.27 vs USNA's 1.34
DividendsNHTC logoNHTC25.0% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NATR logoNATR+85.3% vs MTEX's -53.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NATR logoNATR7.6% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.8%

MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MTEXMannatech, Incorporated
FY 2024
Consolidated product sales
95.3%$112M
Consolidated pack sales
3.5%$4M
Consolidated other, including freight
1.3%$2M
NHTCNatural Health Trends Corp.
FY 2019
Product
92.3%$73M
Shipping and Handling
7.7%$6M
QNSTQuinStreet, Inc.
FY 2025
Financial Service
74.7%$817M
Home Services
23.9%$262M
Service, Other
1.3%$15M
NATRNature's Sunshine Products, Inc.
FY 2025
Personal Care Products
100.0%$23M
USNAUSANA Health Sciences, Inc.
FY 2025
All Other
100.0%$18M

MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNATRLAGGINGUSNA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — QNST and NATR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

QNST is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 30.9x NHTC's $38M. NATR is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NHTC's -3.0%. On growth, QNST holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMTEX logoMTEXMannatech, Incorp…NHTC logoNHTCNatural Health Tr…QNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.NATR logoNATRNature's Sunshine…USNA logoUSNAUSANA Health Scie…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$110M$38M$1.2B$490M$925M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M-$2M$26M$38M$91M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$1M-$30M$20M$11M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$6M$99M$23M$9M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.1%+73.8%+10.5%+69.9%+76.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.5%-5.1%+1.7%+5.7%+5.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.5%-3.0%-2.6%+4.1%+1.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.6%-16.5%+8.4%+4.7%+0.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.1%-14.3%+28.3%+8.5%+5.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.9%-2.4%+59.4%+16.0%-142.2%
Evenly matched — QNST and NATR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MTEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.5x trailing earnings, MTEX trades at a 98% valuation discount to QNST's 165.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MTEX's 1.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QNST's 21.8x.

MetricMTEX logoMTEXMannatech, Incorp…NHTC logoNHTCNatural Health Tr…QNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.NATR logoNATRNature's Sunshine…USNA logoUSNAUSANA Health Scie…
Market CapShares × price$9M$36M$761M$430M$359M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4M$32M$671M$355M$215M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS3.54x-41.72x165.55x23.16x33.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.47x21.92x11.18x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.41x21.84x9.20x2.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.08x0.90x0.70x0.90x0.39x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.02x1.57x3.19x2.81x0.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.52x9.18x14.90x42.13x
MTEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NATR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NATR delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-24 for MTEX. USNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTEX's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QNST scores 8/9 vs NHTC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMTEX logoMTEXMannatech, Incorp…NHTC logoNHTCNatural Health Tr…QNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.NATR logoNATRNature's Sunshine…USNA logoUSNAUSANA Health Scie…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.8%-4.9%-11.1%+12.1%+1.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-4.9%-2.9%-5.9%+7.6%+1.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.3%-6.5%+2.8%+21.0%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.3%-6.1%+2.4%+13.8%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952857
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x0.13x0.04x0.12x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M-$4M-$91M-$75M-$144M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$11M$7M$101M$94M$158M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$3M$10M$19M$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.38x4.64x1100.81x50.32x
NATR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NATR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NATR five years ago would be worth $11,883 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,999 for USNA. Over the past 12 months, NATR leads with a +85.3% total return vs MTEX's -53.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NATR at 31.8% vs USNA's -33.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMTEX logoMTEXMannatech, Incorp…NHTC logoNHTCNatural Health Tr…QNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.NATR logoNATRNature's Sunshine…USNA logoUSNAUSANA Health Scie…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-44.1%+7.1%-5.1%+17.1%+0.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-53.3%-20.7%-26.9%+85.3%-31.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.8%-5.7%+81.0%+129.0%-70.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.0%-9.6%-28.4%+18.8%-80.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.2%-63.6%+288.4%+180.2%-68.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.8%-1.9%+21.9%+31.8%-33.6%
NATR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MTEX and NATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MTEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USNA's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATR currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs MTEX's 37.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMTEX logoMTEXMannatech, Incorp…NHTC logoNHTCNatural Health Tr…QNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.NATR logoNATRNature's Sunshine…USNA logoUSNAUSANA Health Scie…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.27x0.58x1.23x0.62x1.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.45$6.00$18.41$28.14$38.32
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.20$2.40$10.29$12.90$16.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.5%+53.3%+72.6%+87.2%+50.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.657.953.349.659.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10K25K673K103K118K
Evenly matched — MTEX and NATR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NATR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: QNST as "Buy", NATR as "Buy", USNA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 79.9% upside for USNA (target: $35) vs -20.6% for NATR (target: $20). NHTC is the only dividend payer here at 25.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMTEX logoMTEXMannatech, Incorp…NHTC logoNHTCNatural Health Tr…QNST logoQNSTQuinStreet, Inc.NATR logoNATRNature's Sunshine…USNA logoUSNAUSANA Health Scie…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$19.50$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1348
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+25.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.8%+7.7%
NATR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NATR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MTEX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNature's Sunshine Products,… (NATR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MTEX vs NHTC vs QNST vs NATR vs USNA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.

(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?

On trailing P/E, Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the cheapest at 3.

5x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 165. 6x. On forward P/E, QuinStreet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?

Over the past 5 years, Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.

(NATR) delivered a total return of +18. 8%, compared to -80. 0% for USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QNST returned +288. 4% versus USNA's -68. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus USANA Health Sciences, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning USNA is approximately 402% more volatile than MTEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, USANA Health Sciences, Inc. (USNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 78% for Mannatech, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.

(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus -10. 7% for Mannatech, Incorporated (MTEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mannatech, Incorporated grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -254. 0% for Natural Health Trends Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QNST leads at 23. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?

Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.

(NATR) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 1% net margin versus -2. 2% for Natural Health Trends Corp. — meaning it keeps 4. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USNA leads at 5. 5% versus -4. 5% for NHTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USNA leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, QuinStreet, Inc.

(QNST) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USNA: 79. 9% to $35. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA?

In this comparison, NHTC (25.

0% yield) pays a dividend. MTEX, QNST, NATR, USNA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MTEX or NHTC or QNST or NATR or USNA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Health Trends Corp.

(NHTC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58), 25. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHTC: -63. 6%, USNA: -68. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MTEX and NHTC and QNST and NATR and USNA?

These companies operate in different sectors (MTEX (Consumer Defensive) and NHTC (Consumer Cyclical) and QNST (Communication Services) and NATR (Consumer Defensive) and USNA (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MTEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; NHTC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QNST is a small-cap high-growth stock; NATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NHTC pays a dividend while MTEX, QNST, NATR, USNA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MTEX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NHTC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 44%
  • Dividend Yield > 10.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QNST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NATR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

USNA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MTEX and NHTC and QNST and NATR and USNA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MTEX: -8.1% · NHTC: -14.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.