Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PRPL vs LEG vs SNBR vs MHK vs LOVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
PRPL vs LEG vs SNBR vs MHK vs LOVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $56M | $1.41B | $69M | $6.29B | $228M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $505M | $3.03B | $1M | $10.99B | $690M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $225M | $-132K | $414M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 23.7% | 59.0% | 24.3% | 57.7% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 7.5% | -3.3% | 4.9% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.6x | — | 11.2x | 25.7x |
| Total Debt | $204M | $1.66B | $354M | $2.76B | $183M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $587M | $2M | $856M | $84M |
PRPL vs LEG vs SNBR vs MHK vs LOVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| Leggett & Platt, In… (LEG) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRPL vs LEG vs SNBR vs MHK vs LOVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.08
- Beta 1.08, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 1.08 vs SNBR's 2.70
LEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 25.7x)
- 7.4% margin vs SNBR's -9.4%
- 1.9% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +15.3% vs SNBR's -56.8%
SNBR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MHK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.5%, EPS growth -27.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- -47.6% 10Y total return vs LOVE's -34.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- -0.5% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
Among these 5 stocks, LOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.5% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 25.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs SNBR's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs SNBR's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.3% vs SNBR's -56.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 8.0% vs -15.8% |
PRPL vs LEG vs SNBR vs MHK vs LOVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRPL vs LEG vs SNBR vs MHK vs LOVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LEG leads in 3 of 6 categories
MHK leads 1 • PRPL leads 0 • SNBR leads 0 • LOVE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MHK is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 7784.8x SNBR's $1M. LEG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNBR's -9.4%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $505M | $3.0B | $1M | $11.0B | $690M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $318M | $72M | $1.2B | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $225M | -$132,000 | $414M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $207M | -$21M | $709M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +23.7% | +59.0% | +24.3% | +57.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +7.5% | -3.3% | +4.9% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +7.4% | -9.4% | +3.8% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +6.8% | -14.6% | +6.5% | -1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.1% | -100.0% | -3.8% | +8.0% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.6% | -36.4% | -11.2% | +65.2% | -18.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LEG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, LEG trades at a 73% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LEG's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LOVE's 11.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $1.4B | $69M | $6.3B | $228M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $236M | $2.5B | $422M | $8.2B | $327M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.07x | 6.10x | -0.53x | 17.33x | 22.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.56x | — | 11.23x | 25.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.83x | — | 7.05x | 11.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 0.35x | 49.07x | 0.58x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.41x | — | 0.77x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.00x | — | 10.20x | 13.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LEG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LEG delivers a 23.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $5 for MHK. MHK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEG's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LEG scores 7/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +23.1% | — | +5.0% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.1% | +6.3% | -0.0% | +3.0% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.8% | +8.0% | -0.0% | +3.9% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.8% | +8.6% | — | +4.8% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.62x | — | 0.33x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $180M | $1.1B | $353M | $1.9B | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $587M | $2M | $856M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $204M | $1.7B | $354M | $2.8B | $183M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.32x | 4.40x | -780.16x | 36.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MHK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MHK five years ago would be worth $4,472 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, LEG leads with a +15.3% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHK at 0.9% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.6% | -5.8% | -64.7% | -6.2% | +8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.3% | +15.3% | -56.8% | +1.9% | -23.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.8% | -61.9% | -87.2% | +2.9% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.3% | -72.2% | -97.3% | -55.3% | -78.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -52.6% | -87.6% | -47.6% | -34.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -44.4% | -27.5% | -49.6% | +0.9% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRPL and LEG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LEG currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.55x | 2.70x | 1.34x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.26 | $13.00 | $13.94 | $143.13 | $21.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $7.86 | $1.07 | $93.60 | $10.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.8% | +79.3% | +21.7% | +71.8% | +71.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 56.9 | 53.4 | 50.6 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 322K | 2.5M | 2.8M | 1.1M | 299K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LEG as "Hold", SNBR as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", LOVE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 230.0% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs 16.4% for LEG (target: $12). LEG is the only dividend payer here at 1.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.00 | $10.00 | $130.00 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 11 | 32 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.8% | +2.4% | +8.7% |
LEG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MHK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
PRPL vs LEG vs SNBR vs MHK vs LOVE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE?
On trailing P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE?
Over the past 5 years, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) delivered a total return of -55. 3%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOVE returned -34. 9% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Purple Innovation, Inc.
(PRPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 70β — meaning SNBR is approximately 149% more volatile than PRPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 162% for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leggett & Platt, Incorporated grew EPS 145. 3% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE?
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEG leads at 5. 9% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 16. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNBR: 230. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE?
In this comparison, LEG (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. PRPL, SNBR, MHK, LOVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRPL or LEG or SNBR or MHK or LOVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
9% yield). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEG: -52. 6%, SNBR: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRPL and LEG and SNBR and MHK and LOVE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SNBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LEG pays a dividend while PRPL, SNBR, MHK, LOVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.