Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 8.6x · EV/EBITDA 16.2x · ROE 12.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6.8B | $8.4B | $9.7B | $9.1B | $5.8B | $8.6B | $7.1B | $3.4B | $1.9B | $2.9B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $21.1B | $22.8B | $23.1B | $19.5B | $13.5B | $13.4B | $11.1B | $7.1B | $5.3B | $5.8B | $4.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | 8.62 | 10.28 | 12.05 | 9.07 | 4.63 | 8.12 | 15.00 | 12.67 | 7.03 | 11.65 | 12.54 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.18 | 1.27 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.10 | 1.85 | 2.65 | 2.34 | 1.56 | 2.63 | 2.71 |
| P/FCF | — | 1455.38 | 131.43 | — | — | 5.60 | 12.19 | 8.61 | 5.17 | 65.54 | — |
| P/OCF | 19.03 | 23.66 | 22.79 | — | — | 4.79 | 9.45 | 6.56 | 3.60 | 19.15 | 27.19 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.55 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.20 | 12.36 | 11.78 | 9.95 | 6.24 | 7.33 | 13.59 | 11.71 | 10.11 | 12.34 | 12.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 14.79 | 12.07 | 12.38 | 10.29 | 6.91 | 8.32 | 14.67 | 14.02 | 11.58 | 13.68 | 14.48 |
| EV / FCF | — | 3928.86 | 314.06 | — | — | 8.72 | 19.13 | 17.85 | 14.60 | 132.42 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 15.2% | 15.2% | 15.4% | 16.8% | 18.3% | 18.7% | 16.9% | 15.4% | 15.0% | 15.0% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.8% | 3.8% | 4.4% | 5.5% | 6.9% | 7.3% | 5.3% | 3.9% | 3.8% | 4.1% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | 3.2% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.3% | 12.3% | 12.4% | 17.4% | 25.2% | 28.9% | 22.8% | 20.4% | 23.3% | 24.6% | 22.7% |
| ROA | 3.4% | 3.4% | 3.8% | 5.8% | 9.6% | 11.1% | 6.7% | 4.7% | 5.3% | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| ROIC | 5.2% | 5.2% | 6.4% | 8.6% | 13.0% | 15.5% | 8.8% | 7.6% | 7.8% | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| ROCE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 10.1% | 12.8% | 18.9% | 23.5% | 15.5% | 15.5% | 17.0% | 19.0% | 19.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.22 | 2.22 | 2.08 | 1.80 | 1.52 | 1.06 | 1.57 | 2.57 | 2.87 | 2.74 | 2.63 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.97 | 7.97 | 7.05 | 5.79 | 3.69 | 2.71 | 5.13 | 6.20 | 6.59 | 6.36 | 6.17 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.16 | 2.02 | 1.65 | 1.48 | 1.03 | 1.51 | 2.52 | 2.85 | 2.69 | 2.57 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.78 | 7.78 | 6.85 | 5.31 | 3.57 | 2.62 | 4.93 | 6.06 | 6.53 | 6.23 | 6.04 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2473.48 | 182.63 | — | — | 3.11 | 6.94 | 9.24 | 9.43 | 66.88 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.42 | 2.42 | 3.49 | 5.38 | 11.67 | 12.81 | 7.12 | 3.81 | 3.85 | 5.68 | 6.81 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.41 | 1.46 | 1.38 | 1.35 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.19 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.44 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.50 | 1.56 | 1.58 | 1.88 | 2.05 | 1.66 | 2.08 | 2.20 | 2.15 | 2.26 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.21 | 5.21 | 5.18 | 5.43 | 6.76 | 7.79 | 4.37 | 4.40 | 4.25 | 4.02 | 4.16 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 11.00 | 12.48 | 13.00 | 10.53 | 10.96 | 17.07 | 14.54 | 16.35 | 18.89 | 17.57 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 6.7% | 6.7% | 7.0% | 5.3% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 6.2% | 10.2% | 10.4% | 10.8% | 12.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 11.6% | 9.7% | 8.3% | 11.0% | 21.6% | 12.3% | 6.7% | 7.9% | 14.2% | 8.6% | 8.0% |
| FCF Yield | — | 0.1% | 0.8% | — | — | 17.8% | 8.2% | 11.6% | 19.3% | 1.5% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 14.2% | 11.4% | 3.8% | 0.5% | 11.9% | 2.7% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 8.0% | 1.2% | 4.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 14.9% | 12.0% | 4.4% | 1.1% | 12.7% | 3.1% | 1.1% | 0.9% | 9.4% | 2.1% | 5.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $25M | $27M | $28M | $28M | $29M | $24M | $23M | $25M | $25M | $26M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LAD stock.
Lithia Motors, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 8.6x. The historical average is 13.3x. This places it at the 14th percentile of its historical range.
Lithia Motors, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.4x.
Lithia Motors, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.3%. The historical average is 14.1%.
Based on historical data, Lithia Motors, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 8.6x. This is at the 14th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lithia Motors, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.71% with a payout ratio of 6.7%.
Lithia Motors, Inc. has 15.2% gross margin and 3.8% operating margin.
Lithia Motors, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage-funded growth masking cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Stable Gross Margins Mask Operating Drift
Excluding the anomalous 2026Q2, Lithia's gross margin has held near 15%, yet operating margin slipped from 4.6% in 2024Q3 to 4.2% in 2026Q3 as SG&A growth outpaced revenue; net margin of 2.9% in the latest quarter, per SEC filings, appears inflated by non-operating contributions.
The persistence of gross margin in the 14.9%-15.5% band suggests the underlying retail spread on vehicles and service is not deteriorating, but the sequential compression in operating margin from the 4.3%-4.6% range to 4.2% appears to reflect SG&A growing faster than the top line — consistent with scaling costs at Driveway and integration expense from the acquisition cadence. For analytical purposes, operating margin (or SG&A as a percentage of gross profit) likely reflects true earning power better than net margin, since the 2026Q2 print shows net income turning positive while gross and operating income were negative, implying the bottom line has been periodically decoupled from dealership economics.
Roll-Up Returns Remain Sub-Scale
Lithia's ROIC of 1.4% in 2026Q3, after dipping to -0.5% in the prior quarter, sits far below the 8.0%-8.5% range peers such as Group 1 and AutoNation generate, as reported in peer financials, suggesting capital deployed through acquisitions is not yet earning a commensurate return.
A ROIC that has drifted from roughly 1.5%-1.6% in 2024 to 1.0%-1.4% in the trailing quarters, against ROE of 3.1%-4.5%, implies the modest return on equity is being produced by financial leverage rather than operating efficiency, since ROIC sits below any plausible cost of capital. Given the reported doubling of goodwill in 2026Q3, the invested-capital denominator now carries substantially more acquisition-driven goodwill; if acquired stores do not deliver the targeted 15%-30% IRRs, further ROIC dilution and impairment risk would appear the more likely path than mean reversion. Investors should monitor whether same-store parts and service growth can lift returns organically before further acquisitions compound the denominator.
Debt Service Tied to Earnings Volatility
Debt-to-equity has climbed to 2.43 in 2026Q3 from 2.04 in mid-2025, and D/EBITDA reached 32.82x while interest coverage collapsed to -1.48x in 2026Q2 before recovering to 3.93x, per quarterly balance sheets, signaling debt service capacity that appears sensitive to quarter-to-quarter earnings volatility.
The swing in interest coverage from near 4x in 2024 to negative territory in 2026Q2 suggests reported EBITDA has become an unstable base for coverage analysis, which means lenders and analysts may need to anchor on covenant definitions rather than headline EBITDA. Leverage rising above Group 1 (2.10x) and Penske (1.58x) while remaining below AutoNation (4.35x) places Lithia mid-peer on D/E, but the direction of travel — up in every quarter of the trailing two years — warrants attention, particularly as cumulative buybacks of roughly $2.08B have been funded externally rather than from operating cash generation. Refinancing risk appears manageable at these coverage levels only if quarterly earnings stabilize; a repeat of the 2026Q2 dislocation would likely pressure covenant headroom.
Inventory Weight Defines Working Capital
Asset turnover has slipped from 0.41 to 0.37 over ten quarters, and inventory days of 72 in 2026Q3 keep the cash conversion cycle near 75-81 days where disclosed; DPO data is unavailable for the two most recent quarters, per reported filings, limiting full-cycle visibility.
Days of inventory at 66-73 across the window, against DSO holding steady at 10-13 days, confirms that the dealership's working capital profile is essentially an inventory-holding business — customers pay quickly, but the company finances weeks of vehicle stock before sale. The decline in asset turnover alongside a 15.5% expansion in total assets implies incremental assets (largely acquired goodwill and dealership inventory) are generating less revenue per dollar than the legacy base, which is what one would expect during integration but is unfavorable if it persists. Given working capital consumed $3.13B of cash over the period, the CCC trend is arguably the most decision-relevant efficiency metric here, and it appears unlikely to compress structurally while the company prioritizes scale over inventory discipline.
Cheap Multiples Reflect Roll-Up Discount
At 9.15x trailing earnings and 11.31x EV/EBITDA, Lithia trades below Penske's 15.03x P/E but roughly in line with AutoNation, while its 1.13x book value lags peers at 2.0-2.6x, per compiled market data, implying the market discounts the reliability of its acquisition-driven earnings.
The 0.86 PEG ratio and 8.23x forward P/E suggest the market is pricing continued double-digit growth, yet the same-store trajectory decelerated from 19.5% to 2.8% year over year between 2024Q4 and 2026Q3, so the multiple appears to embed an acquisition cadence that may be slowing. The most notable signal is the 1.13x price-to-book versus peer multiples near 2x-2.6x; combined with a 0.17x price-to-sales, this indicates the market applies a conglomerate-style discount to the balance sheet — likely reflecting goodwill intensity (20.9% of assets) and negative free cash flow rather than a simple value opportunity. If acquisition pace decelerates further, convergence toward peer book multiples would appear more plausible than a re-rating upward on earnings multiples alone.
P/E Obscures Operating Earning Power
The P/E is the most misapplied ratio here: Lithia's 9.15x multiple rests on net income that includes a large non-operating swing in 2026Q2, when negative operating income coincided with positive net income; EV/EBITDA or price-to-tangible-book would better reflect operating earning power.
In a franchise model where F&I products, captive finance income (LDFC), and one-time items can move net income independent of the retail operation, headline EPS — as illustrated by the $11.54 print delivered alongside -$144.5M of operating income — can flatter the multiple in both directions, making P/E comparisons with peers misleading when their earnings mixes differ. Analysts should instead anchor on operating margin plus an adjusted EBITDA framework that treats floorplan interest as an operating cost and strips non-operating gains, then benchmark against peer EV/EBITDA (8.2x-15.6x) and tangible book value. The secondary trap is the negative 1,120x-style P/FCF readings; with capex at maintenance levels, the free cash flow shortfall reflects inventory investment and buybacks rather than operating deterioration, so P/FCF should be set aside in favor of inventory-adjusted cash metrics.