Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -2.3%. (2017–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.1B | $1.1B | $880M | $2.2B | $7.7B | $15.7B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $7.1B | $41.4B | $5.8B | $11.0B | $17.2B | $20.0B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.72 | — | 1.00 | 0.26 | 0.42 | 1.28 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.35 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.19 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.51 | 1.58 | 2.27 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.56 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 1.53 | 2.20 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.52 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.31 | 0.45 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.71 | 1.06 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | 105.51 | — | 0.32 | 0.73 | 1.12 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 3.25 | 0.38 | 2.53 | 3.55 | 2.89 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 77.6% | 89.3% | 99.4% | 88.3% | 93.3% | 95.4% | 97.3% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -1.6% | 45.6% | 60.6% | 42.9% | 40.0% | 47.7% | 53.0% | 35.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -7.5% | -7.5% | 2.7% | 15.6% | 30.8% | 27.6% | 32.7% | 38.7% | 25.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -2.3% | -2.3% | 0.9% | 9.2% | 18.9% | 18.8% | 32.1% | 48.5% | 28.1% |
| ROA | -0.9% | -0.9% | 0.3% | 2.5% | 5.5% | 6.2% | 10.0% | 9.1% | 3.3% |
| ROIC | -0.2% | -0.2% | 7.7% | 17.7% | 14.0% | 15.4% | 26.0% | 29.3% | 13.9% |
| ROCE | -0.2% | -0.2% | 5.1% | 9.6% | 7.7% | 9.1% | 14.7% | 12.6% | 4.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.48 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.29 | 0.43 | 1.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 2.91 | 1.54 | 1.85 | 1.54 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 2.60 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.49 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.13 | -0.10 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.30 | -0.18 | 0.47 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 3.16 | 0.33 | 2.01 | 1.97 | 0.62 | 3.00 | — | 1.98 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.41 | 0.41 | -0.07 | 2.55 | 2.25 | 2.89 | 6.48 | 3.43 | 0.96 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.56 | 0.56 | 29.50 | 9.51 | 19.02 | 16.20 | 9.02 | 69.35 | 19.27 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.56 | 0.56 | 29.50 | 9.51 | 19.02 | 16.20 | 9.02 | 69.35 | 19.27 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.51 | 0.51 | 25.63 | 7.68 | 13.15 | 9.87 | 2.99 | 38.99 | 9.81 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 161.9% | 88.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 100.3% | 390.7% | 237.7% | 78.2% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 1149.5% | 1701.6% | 194.6% | 63.2% | 44.1% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 84.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 84.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $433M | $287M | $287M | $340M | $276M | $272M | $269M | $266M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LU stock.
Lufax Holding Ltd's current P/E ratio is -1.7x. The historical average is 0.7x.
Lufax Holding Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is -2.3%. The historical average is 19.3%.
Based on historical data, Lufax Holding Ltd is trading at a P/E of -1.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Lufax Holding Ltd has 77.6% gross margin and -1.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Capital erosion from credit losses
Deep Discount Reflects Broken Economics
Lufax trades at a P/B of 0.04, a profound discount that implies the market assigns near-zero value to its tangible equity and expects continued capital erosion from credit losses.
The P/B multiple of 0.04 is far below peers like QFIN (0.33) and FINV (0.39), suggesting the market views Lufax's equity as impaired rather than a going-concern franchise. This valuation implies a negative return on tangible equity expectation, consistent with the reported negative ROE and NIM, and indicates investors are pricing the company for further balance sheet deterioration rather than a turnaround.
Negative ROE Signals Capital Destruction
Return on equity has been negative for eight consecutive quarters, reaching -0.5% in Q2 2026, indicating the business is destroying shareholder capital rather than generating returns.
The persistent negative ROE is driven by a combination of negative net interest margins and substantial credit impairment provisions that overwhelm any fee income. This is not a cyclical downturn but a structural outcome of the risk-bearing model transition, where the cost of risk exceeds the yield on assets, making the core lending economics unprofitable.
Negative NIM and Inefficient Cost Structure
The net interest margin collapsed to -0.1% in Q2 2026 from a positive 1.3% in 2023, while the efficiency ratio spiked to 92.3%, indicating a complete breakdown in core banking economics.
The negative NIM confirms that funding costs now exceed asset yields, a critical failure for any financial institution. The erratic efficiency ratio, swinging from 33% to 140% and back to 92%, suggests extreme volatility in operating expenses relative to a shrinking revenue base, pointing to a high fixed-cost structure that cannot be scaled down quickly enough.
Equity-to-Assets Ratio Masks Erosion
The equity-to-assets ratio of 0.40 appears high, but it is a function of a rapidly shrinking asset base rather than a strong capital position, as absolute equity has declined 15.3% since 2023.
While the 40% equity ratio is well above typical bank minimums, it is misleading because the denominator (total assets) is contracting due to loan runoff. The more telling metric is the absolute decline in shareholders' equity from $93.3B to $79.0B, which directly reduces the loss-absorption buffer. This trend suggests the capital base is being consumed by operating losses and provisions, not strengthened.
Provisions Overwhelm a Shrinking Book
Credit impairment provisions surged to $5.4B in late 2025, representing over 67% of total equity at the time, indicating severe asset quality stress within the remaining loan portfolio.
The magnitude of provisions relative to equity is alarming and suggests that the risk-bearing model is generating losses at a rate that could rapidly erode the remaining capital buffer. This level of provisioning indicates that the underlying collateral or borrower quality in the SBO segment is deteriorating significantly, warranting close monitoring of delinquency trends.
P/B Ratio Misleads on Solvency
The P/B ratio of 0.04 is the most misapplied metric, as it obscures the reality that book value itself is being actively eroded by losses, making the discount appear deeper than the underlying economics warrant.
Investors may interpret the extreme P/B discount as a potential value trap or recovery play, but this ignores that the 'B' (book value) is a declining figure due to persistent negative ROE. A more appropriate metric is the tangible book value per share trend, which has fallen from $299.14 to $164.72, confirming that the equity base is shrinking. The P/B ratio thus misleads by implying a static asset base when the reality is dynamic capital destruction.