Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HHS vs CRM vs HUBS vs TWLO vs DDOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
HHS vs CRM vs HUBS vs TWLO vs DDOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $21M | $174.91B | $10.16B | $30.56B | $71.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $160M | $41.52B | $3.30B | $5.30B | $3.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-811K | $7.46B | $100M | $104M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 77.7% | 83.7% | 48.8% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 21.5% | 1.9% | 4.7% | -0.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.4x | 15.2x | 35.4x | 86.9x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $6.74B | $485M | $1.08B | $1.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $7.33B | $882M | $682M | $401M |
HHS vs CRM vs HUBS vs TWLO vs DDOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS) | 100 | 123.7 | +23.7% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 104.0 | +4.0% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 98.7 | -1.3% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 280.8 | +180.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HHS vs CRM vs HUBS vs TWLO vs DDOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HHS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 0.68, current ratio 1.54x
- Beta 0.68 vs TWLO's 1.47
CRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
- 18.0% margin vs HHS's -0.5%
- 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 6.6% ROA vs HHS's -0.9%, ROIC 10.9% vs 4.4%
HUBS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 86.9x)
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +91.7% vs HUBS's -70.1%
DDOG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 433.0% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 6.0%
- 27.7% revenue growth vs HHS's -13.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% revenue growth vs HHS's -13.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 86.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs HHS's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs TWLO's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.7% vs HUBS's -70.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs HHS's -0.9%, ROIC 10.9% vs 4.4% |
HHS vs CRM vs HUBS vs TWLO vs DDOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HHS vs CRM vs HUBS vs TWLO vs DDOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRM leads in 3 of 6 categories
HHS leads 1 • TWLO leads 1 • HUBS leads 0 • DDOG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.5B annually — 260.2x HHS's $160M. CRM is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HHS's -0.5%. On growth, DDOG holds the edge at +32.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $160M | $41.5B | $3.3B | $5.3B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $11.4B | $166M | $415M | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$811,000 | $7.5B | $100M | $104M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $14.4B | $712M | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +77.7% | +83.7% | +48.8% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +21.5% | +1.9% | +4.7% | -0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +18.0% | +3.0% | +2.0% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +34.7% | +21.6% | +19.0% | +29.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | +12.1% | +23.4% | +20.0% | +32.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +190.9% | +18.3% | +2.5% | +3.8% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HHS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.3x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 98% valuation discount to TWLO's 960.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HHS's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DDOG's 926.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $174.9B | $10.2B | $30.6B | $71.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $174.3B | $9.8B | $31.0B | $72.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.64x | 23.31x | 229.47x | 960.48x | 667.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.44x | 15.21x | 35.36x | 86.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.91x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.68x | 19.55x | 55.50x | 78.95x | 926.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 4.21x | 3.24x | 6.03x | 20.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 2.94x | 5.08x | 4.12x | 19.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.14x | 14.36x | 29.58x | 71.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRM delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-4 for HHS. CRM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HHS's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRM scores 8/9 vs HHS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | +12.6% | +5.0% | +1.3% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | +6.6% | +2.7% | +1.1% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +10.9% | +0.4% | +1.6% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +11.9% | +0.5% | +1.9% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.11x | 0.23x | 0.14x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$590M | -$397M | $399M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $7.3B | $882M | $682M | $401M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $6.7B | $485M | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 44.14x | 6749.00x | — | 4.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DDOG five years ago would be worth $26,042 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,057 for HUBS. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +91.7% total return vs HUBS's -70.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 54.4% vs HUBS's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.8% | -28.1% | -48.4% | +45.8% | +49.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.6% | -34.4% | -70.1% | +91.7% | +83.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.6% | -6.3% | -55.6% | +267.8% | +154.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | -13.3% | -59.4% | -31.6% | +160.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | +148.6% | +359.7% | +600.6% | +433.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.5% | -2.1% | -23.7% | +54.4% | +36.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HHS and DDOG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HHS is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWLO's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DDOG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 28.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.75x | 1.01x | 1.47x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.39 | $296.05 | $682.57 | $203.71 | $201.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $163.52 | $180.50 | $91.84 | $98.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.3% | +61.4% | +28.9% | +99.0% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 53.0 | 55.6 | 79.9 | 83.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 12.1M | 1.5M | 2.2M | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CRM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRM as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", DDOG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for CRM (target: $287) vs -8.2% for TWLO (target: $185). CRM is the only dividend payer here at 0.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $287.00 | $306.10 | $185.17 | $202.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 97 | 47 | 52 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.66 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +7.2% | +4.9% | +2.8% | 0.0% |
CRM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HHS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HHS vs CRM vs HUBS vs TWLO vs DDOG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 9% for Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) a "Buy" — based on 97 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 23. 3x versus Twilio Inc. at 960. 5x. On forward P/E, HubSpot, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG?
Over the past 5 years, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) delivered a total return of +160. 4%, compared to -59. 4% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +600. 6% versus HHS's -82. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Harte Hanks, Inc.
(HHS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Twilio Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning TWLO is approximately 116% more volatile than HHS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 109% for Harte Hanks, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus -13. 9% for Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -41. 2% for Datadog, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG?
Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -0. 5% for Harte Hanks, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRM leads at 21. 5% versus -1. 3% for DDOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 86. 9x for Datadog, Inc. — 71. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRM: 57. 8% to $287. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG?
In this comparison, CRM (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. HHS, HUBS, TWLO, DDOG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HHS or CRM or HUBS or TWLO or DDOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 0. 9% yield, +148. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +148. 6%, TWLO: +600. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HHS and CRM and HUBS and TWLO and DDOG?
These companies operate in different sectors (HHS (Communication Services) and CRM (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and DDOG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CRM pays a dividend while HHS, HUBS, TWLO, DDOG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.