Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNBR vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
SNBR vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $69M | $56M | $228M | $2.50B | $22.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $505M | $690M | $3.41B | $7.81B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132K | $-35M | $13M | $110M | $1.09B |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | 40.9% | 57.7% | 44.5% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | -6.1% | 6.3% | 10.6% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.7x | 19.3x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $354M | $204M | $183M | $3.94B | $1.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $24M | $84M | $30M | $1.02B |
SNBR vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Purple Innovation, … (PRPL) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| The Lovesac Company (LOVE) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Rh (RH) | 100 | 61.7 | -38.3% |
| Williams-Sonoma, In… (WSM) | 100 | 441.0 | +341.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNBR vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNBR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 1.08 vs SNBR's 2.70
LOVE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 84.6%, current ratio 1.59x
- Beta 1.33, current ratio 1.59x
RH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth -38.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.4%
- 5.0% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9%
- Lower P/E (19.3x vs 21.1x)
WSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 1.49, yield 1.4%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs RH's 257.5%
- 13.9% margin vs SNBR's -9.4%
- 1.4% yield; 20-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.3x vs 21.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs SNBR's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs SNBR's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; 20-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.2% vs SNBR's -56.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs PRPL's -12.1%, ROIC 44.3% vs -15.8% |
SNBR vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNBR vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSM leads in 4 of 6 categories
LOVE leads 1 • SNBR leads 0 • PRPL leads 0 • RH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 5530.9x SNBR's $1M. WSM is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNBR's -9.4%. On growth, PRPL holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $505M | $690M | $3.4B | $7.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | -$12M | $58M | $465M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132,000 | -$35M | $13M | $110M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | -$15M | -$11M | $128M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.0% | +40.9% | +57.7% | +44.5% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | -6.1% | +6.3% | +10.6% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | -7.0% | +1.9% | +3.2% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | -3.0% | -1.5% | +3.8% | +13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +35.1% | +2.5% | +8.9% | -4.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | -55.6% | -18.4% | +10.2% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LOVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.8x trailing earnings, WSM trades at a 44% valuation discount to RH's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOVE's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RH's 14.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $69M | $56M | $228M | $2.5B | $22.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $422M | $236M | $327M | $6.4B | $23.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | -1.07x | 22.64x | 36.94x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.68x | 19.34x | 21.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.54x | 14.16x | 13.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 49.07x | 0.12x | 0.34x | 0.79x | 2.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 1.21x | — | 10.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 13.06x | — | 21.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RH delivers a 32.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $7 for LOVE. WSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOVE scores 5/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +6.5% | +32.9% | +51.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | -12.1% | +2.6% | +2.3% | +20.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -15.8% | +3.3% | +6.9% | +44.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -15.8% | +3.6% | +9.3% | +41.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.85x | — | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $353M | $180M | $99M | $3.9B | $437M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $24M | $84M | $30M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $354M | $204M | $183M | $3.9B | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -780.16x | -0.32x | — | 1.12x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSM five years ago would be worth $20,735 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $169 for PRPL. Over the past 12 months, WSM leads with a +18.2% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSM at 48.4% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -64.7% | -28.6% | +8.2% | -30.9% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.8% | -37.3% | -23.5% | -29.3% | +18.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | -82.8% | -40.1% | -48.1% | +227.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | -98.3% | -78.4% | -80.9% | +107.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -94.8% | -34.9% | +257.5% | +587.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.6% | -44.4% | -15.7% | -19.6% | +48.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRPL and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSM currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 1.08x | 1.33x | 2.36x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.94 | $1.26 | $21.90 | $257.00 | $221.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $0.47 | $10.33 | $106.31 | $147.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.7% | +40.8% | +71.3% | +52.0% | +82.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 36.7 | 53.7 | 48.5 | 48.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 322K | 299K | 1.2M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
WSM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNBR as "Hold", LOVE as "Buy", RH as "Buy", WSM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 230.0% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs 9.1% for WSM (target: $200). WSM is the only dividend payer here at 1.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | — | $22.50 | $208.00 | $200.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — | 11 | 37 | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% | +8.7% | +0.5% | +3.8% |
WSM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LOVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SNBR vs PRPL vs LOVE vs RH vs WSM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rh (RH) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) offers the better valuation at 20. 8x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM?
On trailing P/E, Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
(WSM) is the cheapest at 20. 8x versus Rh at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Rh is actually cheaper at 19. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM?
Over the past 5 years, Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
(WSM) delivered a total return of +107. 3%, compared to -98. 3% for Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSM returned +587. 8% versus PRPL's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Purple Innovation, Inc.
(PRPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 70β — meaning SNBR is approximately 149% more volatile than PRPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rh (RH) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Purple Innovation, Inc. grew EPS 47. 3% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM?
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
(WSM) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus -11. 0% for Purple Innovation, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSM leads at 18. 1% versus -6. 8% for PRPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rh (RH) trades at 19.
3x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNBR: 230. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM?
In this comparison, WSM (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SNBR, PRPL, LOVE, RH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNBR or PRPL or LOVE or RH or WSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
(WSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield, +587. 8% 10Y return). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSM: +587. 8%, SNBR: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNBR and PRPL and LOVE and RH and WSM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WSM pays a dividend while SNBR, PRPL, LOVE, RH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.